Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Elected vs unelected governments
Topic Started: Aug 18 2016, 03:09 AM (501 Views)
+ Pelador
Member Avatar
Crazy Awesome Legend

Elected governments vs unelected governments. Which are better?

I've always been a sympathiser of unelected governments. True they're much harder to get rid of and they generally tend to be fairly tyrannical. But they get things done, good or bad. Which one could argue is better than nothing being done at all like with the majority of democratic governments.

Some might argue that if you don't like your elected leaders then you can just wait a few years to get some new ones, but the chances of getting a good government seem to be the same as getting a good dictatorship. Think about it. Of all the American Presidents, how many can you say have been great? How many good? And then how many bad? Mostly mediocre right? Often because congress blocked legislation or they just had terrible ideas.

With dictatorships you don't get the legislative limbo. True it's easier for horrible things to happen due to a lack of opposition but like I said before, things at least get legislated.



Posted Image

http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Wagwan
Member Avatar


elected governments should only exist if the electors are intelligent and benevolent
unelected governments should only exist if the governments are intelligent and benevolent
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
breaker335
Member Avatar


Clank
Aug 18 2016, 03:58 AM
elected governments should only exist if the electors are intelligent and benevolent
unelected governments should only exist if the governments are intelligent and benevolent
Sounds about right.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zoom
Member Avatar


I'm starting to loose hope in our political parties.

I don't understand how people would honestly support Trump, forget about the bigotry statements, he's not qualified. His probably the least qualified in recent times. Trump has never delivered a extemporaneous sentences that is meaningful or intelligent.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Son-Goku
Member Avatar
孫悟空

Elected governments are superior but people are getting dumber and the people to elect are getting worse.

@SSj4 Gotenks: The same goes for Clinton, she's no better in fact she's worse.
Edited by Son-Goku, Aug 18 2016, 01:25 PM.
Posted Image
RP Character Bios
Dragon Ball Super: The Super Human
Dragon Ball Super: Preparation for the Tournament of Power
Member Online View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

It's not even a contest. An elected government exists as an extension of the will of the people. I know some people here are cynical and will role their eyes but it's true. If a government f***s up too much and abuses too much power, they will be turfed out. Elections are what keeps those who make and enforce the laws accountable. It also provides a much needed outlet for people to voice their displeasure and disagreement with the way their country is run. What happens when that doesn't exist? Violence, civil unrest. The only way that can be prevented is the curtailment of rights. Restrictions on freedom of speech, freedom of the press, civil liberties, due process, the rule of law etc. If there is anything that history should teach you it's that generally people do not like to be ruled over.

Quote:
 
@SSj4 Gotenks: The same goes for Clinton, she's no better in fact she's worse.


Clinton is not even in the same league of horribleness as Trump. I don't think there's ever been such disparity between the candidates of two parties before.
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lazerbem
Member Avatar


Who said unelected governments are smoother? Very often they can be bureaucratic messes that make the process of Congress look smooth. For an example, look no further than the Nazis for an example of an unelected government(not officially so, Hitler basically muscled into office) that was monstrously inept at basically everything it did.
Posted Image
Crazy cat cults in the woods
Member Online View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Helvius Pertinax Augustus
Member Avatar
What will you do when you get old?

lazerbem
Aug 18 2016, 02:32 PM
Who said unelected governments are smoother? Very often they can be bureaucratic messes that make the process of Congress look smooth. For an example, look no further than the Nazis for an example of an unelected government(not officially so, Hitler basically muscled into office) that was monstrously inept at basically everything it did.
Yeah, and yet people still believe the Nazis were ever able to orchestrate something so large. They'd have been better off had they not broken the alliance with Russia, and tried to make the U.S an ally.

Anyway I'm inclined to think that elected governments are much better, assuming the process takes in to account all of the countries citizens votes and not just who their representatives and superdelegates vote for.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lazerbem
Member Avatar


Quote:
 
Yeah, and yet people still believe the Nazis were ever able to orchestrate something so large. They'd have been better off had they not broken the alliance with Russia, and tried to make the U.S an ally.

That would have required the Nazi ideology to lose the racial supremacist aspect as well as mass bankruptcy since all of Hitler's plans were only sustainable through constant warfare. In other words, they would have to stop being Nazis.
Posted Image
Crazy cat cults in the woods
Member Online View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
breaker335
Member Avatar


Well as bad as Hitler was, he did bring Germany out a Depression, even if it was short lived.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lazerbem
Member Avatar


breaker335
Aug 18 2016, 11:23 PM
Well as bad as Hitler was, he did bring Germany out a Depression, even if it was short lived.
No, he didn't. The Reichsmark was already on the way up by the time that he came into power, he just took the credit for it. What's more is that all of his plans were unsustainable without constant warfare. Also, I'd think that being in a depression is better than having the country be ripped in half for decades to come.
Posted Image
Crazy cat cults in the woods
Member Online View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Helvius Pertinax Augustus
Member Avatar
What will you do when you get old?

He was attempting to pull his people from the Abyss. If he didn't go all out, no holds barred, Germany would have become what it is now a lot sooner.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lazerbem
Member Avatar


What abyss? There was no abyss except in his own deluded mind, unless you seriously think that the false flag attacks were real. He invaded other countries based on delusions of racial superiority and grandeur and predictably ended up getting his a*** whooped and his country ripped to pieces.

I'm sure Hitler probably thought he was pulling them from the abyss, but that's exactly the problem: that's what he thought. And Hitler is not the model of mental health. None of the Nazi cabinet was, 90% of them were complete s*** at their jobs.
Posted Image
Crazy cat cults in the woods
Member Online View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

Jar-Jar Binks
Aug 19 2016, 02:32 AM
If he didn't go all out, no holds barred, Germany would have become what it is now a lot sooner.
What, the world's 4th largest GDP with a high standard of living, third largest import and exporter of goods with universal healthcare, free university education, a strong position in the EU probably the strongest non-p5 State at the UN and in the top 10 countries in the world for human development? Wow, Hitler really was holding them back wasn't he?
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zoom
Member Avatar


Son Goten
Aug 18 2016, 01:25 PM
Elected governments are superior but people are getting dumber and the people to elect are getting worse.

@SSj4 Gotenks: The same goes for Clinton, she's no better in fact she's worse.
This is why i'm starting to loose hope. :p

Bernie Sanders seems okay, and by the looks of things it's only coming down to Clinton or Trump.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91