| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Stephen King's It (September 8, 2017) | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 13 2016, 07:12 PM (2,905 Views) | |
| + Son-Goku | Jul 28 2017, 11:11 PM Post #31 |
![]()
孫悟空
![]()
|
Idk what doesn't look scary about it. |
![]() RP Character Bios Dragon Ball Super: The Super Human Dragon Ball Super: Preparation for the Tournament of Power | |
![]() |
|
| lazerbem | Jul 28 2017, 11:33 PM Post #32 |
![]() ![]()
|
Look to 70% of the "possessed" genre movie. They get away with incredibly minimal effects and have flooded the market. Come on, horror movies that aren't CGI are ridiculously common. Also, remember the giant spider from the original It. That thing was practical and it still came off as meh. |
![]() Crazy cat cults in the woods | |
![]() |
|
| + Steve | Jul 29 2017, 12:21 AM Post #33 |
![]()
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.
![]()
|
Having as little practical effects as possible hardly counts... And I never said they're always good but if a film from the 70's can have far more real and creepy looking monsters than CGI today...imagine what they could achieve with practical effects today? The original Xenomorph is still terrifying, compared to the CGI crap in the recent movie. |
![]() Definitely not a succubus, fear not | |
![]() |
|
| lazerbem | Jul 29 2017, 01:21 AM Post #34 |
![]() ![]()
|
Yeah, it does. You said a horror movie without CGI, I provided. Also, the Saw franchise and associated things are minimal CG too with lots of practical.
That has very little to do with effects and more with shooting styles. You'll notice 70's monsters are utterly incapable of moving with any kind of speed on-screen and so the movement has to be implied or done over very short bursts, and so the filming is made to compensate that by using different camera angles to avoid showing the robot's innards or whatever.
![]() Because it's filmed better, maybe. But not due to any real difference in regards to the puppet, as you can see here where even a simple tail swipe requires a very awkward series of cuts to avoid any problems, and even then the Xenomorph just holding his arms straight in front of his head stock still isn't so grand. |
![]() Crazy cat cults in the woods | |
![]() |
|
| Strawberry | Jul 29 2017, 02:02 AM Post #35 |
![]()
Chiaroscuro ♥
![]()
|
So am I alone here in thinking the trailer looks awesome? I'm dying to watch this movie. Pennywise was absolutely terrifying for me as a kid and now I can't help but find him kinda goofy looking, so I'm glad the imagery and styling is being revamped and I really like what I'm seeing so far
|
![]() ![]() ♪ ♥ ♫ Across The Universe
| |
![]() |
|
| + Son-Goku | Jul 29 2017, 02:03 AM Post #36 |
![]()
孫悟空
![]()
|
I think it looks good. But I don't think I can handle it. |
![]() RP Character Bios Dragon Ball Super: The Super Human Dragon Ball Super: Preparation for the Tournament of Power | |
![]() |
|
| + Steve | Jul 29 2017, 07:11 AM Post #37 |
![]()
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.
![]()
|
Are you suggesting Saw is actual horror and not just gore porn? There's nothing scary about the Saw films they're just disgusting.
Which matters why? They're still convincing, it's better than seeing a big blob on the screen that looks like it was photoshopped there. Alien 3's CGI is a good example when you see the Xeno run it looks appallingly bad. Obviously things have come along since then but it still never looks real. Surely a movie with mostly practical effects could be done amazingly well with animatronics and general movie making techniques today. |
![]() Definitely not a succubus, fear not | |
![]() |
|
| Darker | Jul 29 2017, 07:56 AM Post #38 |
![]()
The Lord of the Dark
![]()
|
You could say that about literally any movie
|
Piccolo: Just how many people have you sacrificed?! Cell: Sacrifice? Hmph, rubbish! On the contrary, it is an honor to become a fraction of my power. | |
![]() |
|
| + Steve | Jul 29 2017, 09:01 AM Post #39 |
![]()
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.
![]()
|
How? I mean people are only hyped because IT is already a thing and apparently good. As a completely standalone experience I doubt this movie would be considered as classic as the first one. Compared to something like Halloween that stands out on it's own. I stake my claim! This movie will be "okay" at best. |
![]() Definitely not a succubus, fear not | |
![]() |
|
| Darker | Jul 29 2017, 09:23 AM Post #40 |
![]()
The Lord of the Dark
![]()
|
It's a horror movie about a killer clown. That makes it an instant classic :P |
Piccolo: Just how many people have you sacrificed?! Cell: Sacrifice? Hmph, rubbish! On the contrary, it is an honor to become a fraction of my power. | |
![]() |
|
| lazerbem | Jul 29 2017, 03:20 PM Post #41 |
![]() ![]()
|
It's labeled as a horror movie so I'm going to call it one.
It matters because what you're complaining about has nothing to do with CGI and more to do with the fact that people want more of the monster on-screen. In fact, people complain if the monster isn't on-screen very much or if it's obscured by shots in the dark. With the prop aliens, they only look more convincing because it's close-ups with frantic cuts or otherwise a limp body. When the camera pulls out, it does look derpy.
![]() This one looks no different between the puppet and CGI. The only difference is that the CGI one actually moves and that's the difference you see. The puppets can move, but it looks worse when they do it. Look at the movement cycle on this puppet for instance. Even with red lights blocking out most of it, you can still see that the way its limbs move is really off ![]()
It hit critical mass. What that is to say is that animatronics can be big and impressive, but they are forced to be mostly static or at least very slow. There's still no way to make them go with any kind of speed. As such, the problem then becomes with filming styles that want to show more of the monster or give the monster more movement. That's what you should be taking issue with. |
![]() Crazy cat cults in the woods | |
![]() |
|
| Darker | Jul 29 2017, 03:41 PM Post #42 |
![]()
The Lord of the Dark
![]()
|
Common? Pretty much nothing but CGI and little to no practical effects are used nowadays lol Unless you go back like a few decades, when CGI was more than rare. |
Piccolo: Just how many people have you sacrificed?! Cell: Sacrifice? Hmph, rubbish! On the contrary, it is an honor to become a fraction of my power. | |
![]() |
|
| lazerbem | Jul 30 2017, 03:26 AM Post #43 |
![]() ![]()
|
Saw Sinister Insidious The Monster The Animal You're Next Hush Lights Out Don't Breathe The Boy Oculus The Belko Experiment SiREN Need I carry on? These all used either minimal or no CGI. Edited by lazerbem, Jul 30 2017, 03:34 AM.
|
![]() Crazy cat cults in the woods | |
![]() |
|
| Darker | Jul 30 2017, 09:55 AM Post #44 |
![]()
The Lord of the Dark
![]()
|
I was mostly referring to monster movies, since you used an example of one. Like how would I not be aware of any of these. |
Piccolo: Just how many people have you sacrificed?! Cell: Sacrifice? Hmph, rubbish! On the contrary, it is an honor to become a fraction of my power. | |
![]() |
|
| EMIYA | Sep 9 2017, 02:49 AM Post #45 |
|
"I am the bone of my sword."
![]()
|
So the movie has officially come out and I haven't seen it yet but I thought it would be wise to bump this topic up. I actually plan on seeing it tomorrow if possible so I'll give a proper review on it then. However, if the movie is anywhere near as good as the fans and critics of praised it right now, I find it hard that I'm not going to enjoy something about it. It's still only day one, so there's no telling what will happen. Look at "After Earth" it had a strong starting week but dropped horrendously later. Personally, I love Stephen King's work and even its most stereotypical tropes. So I probably will have a bit of a positive bias of the movie if its anywhere near faithful to the book I love. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Television and Films · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:42 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy





























4:42 PM Jul 13