| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Do You Agree?; feminist Interivew | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 7 2016, 03:13 AM (4,262 Views) | |
| + Ginyu | Apr 11 2016, 07:27 PM Post #31 |
![]()
Leve Feyenoord 1!
![]()
|
"But you can't really be part of a movement if you're okay leaving things as they are, therefore anyone not wanting to change how either gender is treated must be sexist by her definition, since thy're not feminists." No, you completely missed her point. She says that we should stop calling ourselves feminists, there are simply sexists and non-sexists. You either support gender equality or you don't. If there is an area where men have an advantage over women without apparent reason, or the other way around, and you actively choose to not change that, then that is sexist. You choose to keep it that way, that is a sexist act. You either want equality or you don't. She's trying to explain what I'm trying to explain to you. Feminism is not just about furthering women, it's about achieving equality for both genders. Feminism is not by definition just for women. It is for equality between both genders, just because it's called feminism doesn't mean it's just for women. It's called feminism because the movement was established when women couldn't even vote or study. It's simple history. It's not like democrats and republicans at all. Oh, and besides, awefull example since what a republican and democrat is has changed. Republicans used to be for African American rights and democrats often opposed those ideas. They pretty much switched sides since the 19th century. So the meaning of movements CAN change. A democrat from long ago wouldn't be a democrat today. And I'm not ignoring your last point, I simply didn't bother to respond to it because you didn't get her point at all. I found it more important to respond to your misconceptions about feminism itself before responding to your misconceptions about what Maisie Williams is advocating. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ask GinyuTokusentai | |
![]() |
|
| Copy_Ninja | Apr 11 2016, 07:38 PM Post #32 |
![]()
Novacane for the pain
![]()
|
Lol completely ignoring what other people have said in the thread. It's easy to attack extreme positions, what about the majority of people in the middle who are simply asking that women be treated socially and professionally the same way men are?
Why? Yes, feminism focuses on women because women are generally the sex that is most effected by gender inequality. It makes sense to focus on the bigger problem. Most of the problems feminism is aimed at tackling benefits men's problems too. Breaking down gender roles helps men by taking the focus away from women being the caregivers and home providers, giving men more of an equal footing as a parent and in a more equal position in terms of parental rights. Toxic masculinity which discourages men from expressing emotion, which contributes to male mental health issues and suicide. Both of these things also help with domestic violence. If there's not a classification of men as the dominant sex or an expectation of masculinity, then society will be more willing to accept that men can also be victims. |
We'll never be those kids again
| |
![]() |
|
| Dankness Lava | Apr 11 2016, 08:06 PM Post #33 |
![]()
Dankness Forever
![]()
|
Men and women have differences on all three of the health levels, so they should be treated differently. I don't know if that's what's being debated though. Admittedly I don't know how feminism even works. Edited by Dankness Lava, Apr 11 2016, 08:07 PM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
Apr 11 2016, 08:07 PM Post #34 |
![]()
|
All three of the health levels? You're going to have to explain that because I really don't know what you mean. |
![]() |
|
| Dankness Lava | Apr 11 2016, 08:18 PM Post #35 |
![]()
Dankness Forever
![]()
|
Mental, physical, and emotional (I think, can't remember perfectly.) The three levels of health. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Gearfried | Apr 11 2016, 08:25 PM Post #36 |
![]()
|
Yeah i agree. i am glad i wasn't raised into an obnoxious, 100% masculine guy. |
http://pixiv.me/hajime87 my tumblr page
| |
![]() |
|
| Darker | Apr 11 2016, 08:36 PM Post #37 |
![]()
The Lord of the Dark
![]()
|
You cannot be serious. |
Piccolo: Just how many people have you sacrificed?! Cell: Sacrifice? Hmph, rubbish! On the contrary, it is an honor to become a fraction of my power. | |
![]() |
|
| Dankness Lava | Apr 11 2016, 08:42 PM Post #38 |
![]()
Dankness Forever
![]()
|
Isn't he at least partially correct? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mihawk | Apr 11 2016, 08:52 PM Post #39 |
![]() ![]()
|
Originally the definition of feminism was to promote the equality of women to men (not both ways). Definitions change, and are usually defined by the majority. The majority of feminists are in the camps of Sarkeesan and Hillary Clinton who both promote ridiculous things, but I do get that there's a minority of feminists that actually want equality both ways (this would be a revised definition). Saying that if you're not a feminist you're sexist is equivalent to saying that if you're not a Republican you don't believe in representative democracy (because of the original intention of republic in republican). The majority of people that hold themselves to the label are going to determine what the label means regardless of people who claim to who have a better definition. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Mihawk | Apr 11 2016, 08:58 PM Post #40 |
![]() ![]()
|
It's kind of a dumb statement. Stereotypes are negative generalizations that don't represent every person in the group. Saying "stereotypes exist" doesn't really mean anything. The only way that statement is valid is if you say that the textbook definition of stereotypes are actually stereotypes which doesn't really mean much. He probably meant "stereotypes are true" which I'm assuming he was smart enough to realize was self negating by the definition of what stereotype means. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Darker | Apr 11 2016, 09:08 PM Post #41 |
![]()
The Lord of the Dark
![]()
|
That's what I ment. Stereotypes don't exist. |
Piccolo: Just how many people have you sacrificed?! Cell: Sacrifice? Hmph, rubbish! On the contrary, it is an honor to become a fraction of my power. | |
![]() |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2016, 12:04 AM Post #42 |
![]()
|
Physical, yes. The other two are due to socialization, not biology. |
![]() |
|
| DanielSan | Apr 12 2016, 03:11 AM Post #43 |
![]()
|
Some of the people in this thread have been elementary views of feminism. Most Gearbox or whoever that was. Feminism is simply just fighting for equal rights of both genders. Yes they do fight for men as well. Most feminist really aren't that extreme at all. There is a curve on just about any kind of classification whether it is political ideology, religion, or anything else. Intersectional Feminism is all about depersonalizing the self and becoming one with all the people in the world. It is seeing people from multiple view points. See all the differences in the world and knowing that while they are there, we know that we are all human. |
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2016, 06:44 AM Post #44 |
![]()
What will you do when you get old?
![]()
|
I make my own definitions. Merriam-Webster is my aunt. |
![]() |
|
| Zoom | Apr 12 2016, 07:20 AM Post #45 |
![]() ![]()
|
What is the definition of feminism in today's age? I also thought (in general terms) it's fighting for equal rights, but my girlfriends friend called me a feminist supporter and said i cannot be a feminist because i'm not doing anything to help the cause and i'm not suffering the equality. I said yes i am, i write to my local parliament member MP, i vote for ever has value in equality and has plans to treat people equal. This is where i got labelled as a supporter. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:43 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy





































4:43 PM Jul 13