| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Public topless women rights ? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 3 2015, 04:55 PM (2,884 Views) | |
| + Ssj3vegito96 | Sep 3 2015, 11:33 PM Post #16 |
![]() ![]()
|
I have a question. Girls are attracted to a mans torso just like men are attracted to a women's. So what do we make of that? Does that mean men should also have to cover up or does that mean women should also be able to be topless? |
IT'S CHEESE![]() Spoiler: click to toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| Tinny | Sep 3 2015, 11:43 PM Post #17 |
![]() ![]()
|
It needs to be one or the other I know that much. Honestly boobs are as sexual as a woman's hips barring what we're taught. Honestly if we just didn't have then covered up I didn't there'd be an issue, but covering up the nipple of a breast, theonly reason the breast is there in the first place, reduces the breast to a fetish object. If society changes to view it as just a breast, similar to men's abs and behind, I don't think anyone would care. And honestly I'm pretty sure they're popping a boner every two minutes anyway Steve ![]() Honestly I don't care, but I'd rather not look at bare chest from either gender. Legally I guess give women the right. |
![]() Above signature created by Graffiti
| |
![]() |
|
| + Ssj3vegito96 | Sep 3 2015, 11:54 PM Post #18 |
![]() ![]()
|
Im not for either side but I'm just bringing up questions. We can show all this crazy killing and blood and gore but we have to cover a girls nipple? Why? We can show a girl and a guys a*** but no girls' nipples?
Edited by Ssj3vegito96, Sep 3 2015, 11:55 PM.
|
IT'S CHEESE![]() Spoiler: click to toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| Cloud | Sep 4 2015, 01:42 AM Post #19 |
![]()
.
![]()
|
I don't personally care if they do. Just so long as people don't complain when I look. I've been socially built up to notice boobs. I don't do it on purpose, I just notice and my brain stops what it was doing and tells me to look. Hell, I even notice when men go topless. I don't want to notice, it stands out. I'd prefer people to be clothed, but what you do is none of my business and my opinions/preferences shouldn't have any impact on your life. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| + miguelnuva | Sep 4 2015, 02:50 AM Post #20 |
![]() ![]()
|
A guy walking around topless is just as arousing fro a girl as a girl walking around topless is for us. I would love to see the free the nipple movement pass just for the fact I like to see topless women but I also know how to respect and not sexually harass a woman. |
![]() Gogeta power placement | |
![]() |
|
| Ding | Sep 4 2015, 02:52 AM Post #21 |
![]() ![]()
|
Not true at all. Girls are more into emotional connections and guys either like tits or a***. (Or dick if they swing that way) |
|
Dingo Dingo | |
![]() |
|
| Tinny | Sep 4 2015, 03:04 AM Post #22 |
![]() ![]()
|
Funny, iirc it's the usher way around, men value personality more than women. It's generally I think healthiness, personality, and sexiness, while for women it's healthiness, sexiness, and personality. Mind you all this is statistics, half remembered statistics at that, the best I can imagine is you're thinking of is how our brains process arousal. |
![]() Above signature created by Graffiti
| |
![]() |
|
| + Steve | Sep 4 2015, 11:44 PM Post #23 |
![]()
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.
![]()
|
Completely wrong. Chimps and stuff have the bare parts on their behinds to attract mates, baboons have the big red a*** too which gets bigger and more red when a female is more fertile. Breasts for humans just took over because we walk on two legs instead of four so it wasn't practical for the a*** to be a governing factor in attraction. That's the only reason they are shaped the way they are versus every other breast feeding system. And again you don't know how those tribes actually operate just because they have breasts on show doesn't mean they don't enjoy a look or cop a feel every now and then or as soon as the camera men go away. We sexualized all parts of the human body more than is natural but they were already sexual to begin with. There is no way we would find them sexual now if they weren't at all sexual anyway. I mean how many people are turned on by the sight of the elbow? Not very many because it's not sexual in the slightest. Of course there are no doubt people with a fetish for elbows as there's a fetish for almost everything. There's no way one scheming individual who likes breasts could convince a whole species that they find breasts attractive and corrupt us forever more, they already liked them. Heck we like them so much even women are born to find them attractive now, even though there's no biological purpose to that what so ever. |
![]() Definitely not a succubus, fear not | |
![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2015, 08:13 AM Post #24 |
|
Keyboard Warriors, Everywhere.
![]()
|
During the Victorian times the ankle was seen as sexual, women who lifted their skirt to show it was considered flirting / a sexual thing to do. They aren't sexy anymore, anyway not much more to be said, I know your point is wrong on this one but each are welcome to their own opinion :P P.S if we were designed to be so sexual no asexual people would exist, fully homosexual males also don't find them attractive so yeah, some design there. |
|
Keyboard Warrior 1. A Person who, being unable to express his anger through physical violence (owning to their physical weakness, lack of bravery and/or conviction in real life), instead manifests said emotions through the text-based medium of the internet, usually in the form of aggressive writing that the Keyboard Warrior would not (for reasons previously mentioned) be able to give form to in real life. 2. Keyboard Warriors are generally identified by unneccessary rage in their written communications, and are regarded as 'losers' by other virtual identities on the internet. | |
![]() |
|
| Buuberries | Sep 5 2015, 10:18 AM Post #25 |
![]()
No
![]()
|
Just because a minority of people differ from the norm doesn't mean the norm isn't true for the species as a whole. It's like saying humans weren't meant to see because some people are born blind. Humans in general find aspects of the other sex attractive. That is instinct; it's why people are driven to have sex and reproduce. So yes there is an evolutionary origins for attraction. In terms of what is attractive, that's down to culture as you've said. Slightly off topic, but humans weren't designed. |
| ¯\(°_o)/¯ | |
![]() |
|
| Rockman | Sep 5 2015, 10:21 AM Post #26 |
![]()
hoighty-toighty
![]()
|
Women's breasts aren't sexual unless you fetish them. An attraction to boobs is a fetish. Stop pretending like it's a sexual organ. They aren't. |
![]() JAke is a copyright of Spazo and Pickle Flavored Fudge Pops inc. | |
![]() |
|
| * Ketchup Revenge | Sep 5 2015, 11:54 AM Post #27 |
![]()
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
![]()
|
I couldn't disagree more. Women's boobs true purpose is to provide nourishment for her young, not be a sexual object for men. Men are trained to think of them as sexual from a very young age. For example, to a non-Muslim, a woman's hair may not be sexual at all; but to a Muslim man, it is. This is the reason why women in that culture keep it covered. |
![]() The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him. | |
![]() |
|
| + Steve | Sep 5 2015, 11:59 AM Post #28 |
![]()
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.
![]()
|
Then do explain why they experience sexual pleasure. It's not a fetish, unless you want to say any attraction to anything is a fetish. Some women can even orgasm from having their breasts played with and the vast majority of them feel pleasure from having them rubbed or squeezed. The nipple providing pleasure makes sense since biologically it would be stupid if breastfeeding was painful but there's no reason for the rest of the breast to feel sexual pleasure other than...to be sexual and provide gratification. They're not a sexual organ exactly, they have no sexual function like the vagina or penis but they are sexual.
Wrong. Look it up. And that's from a time when women were supposed to be almost completely covered up, of course they'd find virtually any skin showing attractive. Who ever said evolution was perfect? Asexuality and homosexuality are no doubt evolved traits, they make no biological sense. Although they could be evolutions form of population control but that's another topic I guess. Also there is a difference between being sexualized and being sexual, I feel like that point is being missed. Breasts were already sexual but we made them more culturally sexual via media and such. Edited by Steve, Sep 5 2015, 12:00 PM.
|
![]() Definitely not a succubus, fear not | |
![]() |
|
| * Ketchup Revenge | Sep 5 2015, 12:21 PM Post #29 |
![]()
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
![]()
|
Anything highly sensitive can experience sexual pleasure. Just because sexual pleasure can be experienced through it doesn't mean that it's a sex organ. And evolutionary, women NEED to feel pleasure from their nipples being stimulated because it doesn't make evolutionary sense for the organism that's providing the nutrients to the young to not have the physical motivation to do it. There has to be some type of pleasurable stimulation associated with that organ if our species is to thrive. Translating it to sexual pleasure is simply psychological, because human sex is usually a whole-body and even psychological experience. No woman walks out of the house with the intention of finding a guy (or girl, whichever) to have her t*ts sucked for an hour. There usually has to be some other type of activity to go along with this. But for example, if she was to receive oral sex, then that could go on for a while. The entire sexual experience can be oral-sex only. Edited by Ketchup Revenge, Sep 5 2015, 12:42 PM.
|
![]() The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him. | |
![]() |
|
| Buuberries | Sep 5 2015, 01:21 PM Post #30 |
![]()
No
![]()
|
i've already addressed this. there are multiple theories out there to explain why men are attracted to breasts, and this is just one of them: the fact that you guys say it's to provide nourishment for their young suggests this. what we're naturally physically attracted to are traits that signify health, fertility, and the ability to provide for potential babies. ofc our sexualised culture amplifies all of this and our specific preferences are based on upbringing and all that shizzle this is confusing sexual acts done in pleasure with the origin of certain body parts being sexualised. the vagina and penis are the most sexual organs but that doesnt mean every man and woman want to suck or eat out dick/pussy. it's a bit harder (lol) to say that there might be some men who dont want their dick sucked, but i've sure as hell met women who arent into cunning linguists just like how ive met women who prefer their breasts being stimulated more than anything. just because not all women want their breasts sucked for an hour doesn't mean it's not a sexual organ. Edited by Buuberries, Sep 5 2015, 01:32 PM.
|
| ¯\(°_o)/¯ | |
![]() |
|
| 0 users reading this topic | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:59 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


































4:59 PM Jul 13