Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
Why are extremely educated people so stupid?; They fall too much to logical fallcies
Topic Started: Jul 17 2015, 10:14 AM (2,195 Views)
Muhahahaha
Default Avatar


Why the hell there are so many people who considered proffesors/extremely educated in general who have studied well even in academy/college,

and yet there are like 2-5 logical fallicies in each of their arguements? It's like they use their knowledge as a way to flee from arguing. They have the debate level of a 5 year old kid, they keep putting way too much baseless assumptions out of their asses without prooving anything.

For example(and I can give many many more):

My extremely educated brother asked me "Why should I listen to someone who doesn't even know to use an oven?"

Why? Because even if my science knowledge is close to zero, I can still find many logical fallicies in your stupid arguements. For example here, you have used 3 logical fallicies:

1. You attacked me instead of my arugement

2. Knowing how to use an oven doesn't mean anything. It doesn't even have anything to do with my knowledge in science in general, expect maybe about an oven.

Why is it like that? Could it be that being heavily educated about subjects like Physics, Mathematics etc has nothing to do with being smart?
Edited by Muhahahaha, Jul 17 2015, 10:26 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Buuberries
Member Avatar
No

how old's your brother?
¯\(°_o)/¯
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Muhahahaha
Default Avatar


Buuberries
Jul 17 2015, 10:29 AM
how old's your brother?
He's 27 years old, was 3 years in the academy in a department where he studied computer science and electronics. Of course his stupid arguement(as well as many many others) are all from 2014-15.

Why?
Edited by Muhahahaha, Jul 17 2015, 10:49 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

To be fair, "debating" someone online or in any informal setting is a far cry from having an actual intellectual debate. You don't really put as much thought in to it in that scenario. I don't really think it's that common to see people using a lot of logical fallacies in arguments other than online, where people like to make out that they are more intelligent than they actually are.

Also, just because an argument contains logical fallacies doesn't automatically make what someone is saying wrong. The example you cited is stupid of course but someone can argue something poorly doesn't necessarily mean what they are arguing is incorrect. Some people just aren't great communicators and struggle to get a point across, even when that point is pretty legitimate.
Edited by Copy_Ninja, Jul 17 2015, 11:14 AM.
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Yeah I call that the fallacy fallacy, pointing out fallacies in someone else's argument is extremely unproductive if you're not opening your mind to try understand what they mean or understand a situation from their point of view.

Of course some people are just that stupid though.


Anyway education doesn't really mean anything when it comes to intelligence. Intelligence is the ability to work out problems, to overcome things you've never experienced before, to make a process more efficient without any prior knowledge to it etc etc

Reading stuff in a book and remembering it isn't intelligent nor is applying it in situations where you're told to apply it. Such as a physics equation, you know you're supposed to use it with whatever problem and that you remember being told that doesn't make you smart.
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Muhahahaha
Default Avatar


Quote:
 
To be fair, "debating" someone online or in any informal setting is a far cry from having an actual intellectual debate. You don't really put as much thought in to it in that scenario. I don't really think it's that common to see people using a lot of logical fallacies in arguments other than online, where people like to make out that they are more intelligent than they actually are.


Agreed - however, sometimes what you can pull out of your head quickly without more time than a few seconds to think shows your thinking abilities, IMO (In the interent it's the opposite).

Quote:
 
Also, just because an argument contains logical fallacies doesn't automatically make someone is saying wrong. The example you cited is stupid of course but someone can argue something poorly doesn't necessarily mean what they are arguing is incorrect.


Agreed, but for me it is enough to conclude that he is idiot if his arguements are in a level that fits a 5 year old, even thought he didn't have much time to think. Of course that doesn't mean he's wrong.

And it is also important to note that this things happen often in the interent too despite the much easier conditions.

Are you saying nothing should be concluded about a person's intelligence from all informal debates?


Quote:
 
Some people just aren't great communicators and struggle to get a point across, even when that point is pretty legitimate.


I doubt that. Why would a smart person not be able to be a great communicators? The abilty to convice people who's thinking is drastically different than yours is much more impressive than being able to solve complicated math/physics problems, IMO. The fact that my brother has the first abilty since he was about 15 years old while he's completely hopeless in the second abilty says it all.
Edited by Muhahahaha, Jul 17 2015, 11:25 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Buuberries
Member Avatar
No

Was just wondering

Quote:
 
Intelligence is the ability to work out problems, to overcome things you've never experienced before, to make a process more efficient without any prior knowledge to it etc etc
in our culture. Implicit beliefs of intelligence actually varies across cultures.

Quote:
 

I doubt that. Why would a smart person not be able to be a great communicators? The abilty to convice people who's thinking is drastically different than yours is much more impressive than being able to solve complicated math/physics problems, IMO. The fact that my brother has the first abilty since he was about 15 years old while he's completely hopeless in the second abilty says it all.
generalising is also a fallacy
Just putting that out there
Edited by Buuberries, Jul 17 2015, 11:35 AM.
¯\(°_o)/¯
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

Muhahahaha
Jul 17 2015, 11:21 AM
Are you saying nothing should be concluded about a person's intelligence from all informal debates?



Not saying that you can't conclude anything from it, just that it's hardly a full proof barometer for how intelligent a person is. It's really just one reference point for a person.

Quote:
 
I doubt that. Why would a smart person not be able to be a great communicators? The abilty to convice people who's thinking is drastically different than yours is much more impressive than being able to solve complicated math/physics problems, IMO. The fact that my brother has the first abilty since he was about 15 years old while he's completely hopeless in the second abilty says it all.


Intelligence manifests in different ways in different people. For some people it's being able to retain and recall a lot of information about a topic, for others it's quick thinking and logical deduction, some people are great problem solvers. Just because ones talents lie in one area and not the others does not make someone unintelligent. Then you've got other things to consider. Some people have social anxiety issues and don't do well talking to others, which obviously has a massive effect in this scenario. Debating someone is far from the be all and end all of intelligence.
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Muhahahaha
Default Avatar


Quote:
 
generalising is also a fallacy
Just putting that out there


Which is why I wrote "IMO". I also should've added the logic rather than "evidence" which can never be enough to prove what I said, which is basically in Steve's post. Thanks for the note anyway.

Quote:
 
Not saying that you can't conclude anything from it, just that it's hardly a full proof barometer for how intelligent a person is. It's really just one reference point for a person.

Intelligence manifests in different ways in different people. For some people it's being able to retain and recall a lot of information about a topic, for others it's quick thinking and logical deduction, some people are great problem solvers. Just because ones talents lie in one area and not the others does not make someone unintelligent. Then you've got other things to consider. Some people have social anxiety issues and don't do well talking to others, which obviously has a massive effect in this scenario. Debating someone is far from the be all and end all of intelligence.


I understand. Its because "inteliigence" and "smart" are words that have many different definitions like you suggested here.

I wonder thought, am I the only human being ever who measures "wisdom" only by how many logical fallacies the person tends to fall to? They mean a lot about the person, don't they? I almost died out of laugher when my brother didn't even know to define a term he uses, and it happened many times as well(sorry if this seems off-topic, but this is also a logic fallacy).


Edited by Muhahahaha, Jul 17 2015, 12:24 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ginyu
Member Avatar
Leve Feyenoord 1!

Muhahahaha
Jul 17 2015, 11:54 AM
I wonder thought, am I the only human being ever who measures "wisdom" only by how many logical fallacies the person tends to fall to? They mean a lot about the person, don't they? I almost died out of laugher when my brother didn't even know to define a term he uses, and it happened many times as well(sorry if this seems off-topic, but this is also a logic fallacy).


There is a lot more to intelligence, wisdom, smartness, etc.
Debating is not the ultimate way to test someone's widsom, there are some incredibly idiotic people out there who are amazing at debating and there are very intelligent people out there who just suck at it
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
Ask GinyuTokusentai
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SpeedoTrunks
Default Avatar


Its a case by case scenario, but there are people who have good memories and can recite information they have remembered to pass tests, and then there are genuinely smart and understand things.

A good case is a friend of mine, he's fairly intelligent, is into cars and radio shows (he presents a local radio show) but ask him about something you would think to be common knowledge and he just has no idea what you're talking about. Its funny as so far as you have a really good in depth discussion about something that most people know (In this case the general gist of how/why certain stones and metals in jewelry are more expensive that others) but you also feel bad that he doesn't know like everything apart from things about cars and radio stations.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Muhahahaha
Default Avatar


Quote:
 
There is a lot more to intelligence, wisdom, smartness, etc.
Debating is not the ultimate way to test someone's widsom, there are some incredibly idiotic people out there who are amazing at debating and there are very intelligent people out there who just suck at it


The way YOU see it. It has already been pointed out that those things have many different definitions, and I don't see much of a connection between things like Technical knowledge and being good at strategy games between wisdom/intelligence/smartness, from the way I define those.

Quote:
 
Its a case by case scenario, but there are people who have good memories and can recite information they have remembered to pass tests, and then there are genuinely smart and understand things.


No, knowing to use information to do things is really easy as long as you remember the necessary details. Remembering the detailes is a serious chellenge sometimes thought. Knowing use the information only shows you understood it perfectly, but that's something most people can do easily. Its like learning to speak a new language. Complicated, but as long as you know everything and work in an Organized way, you'll be fine after a year or so of learning and practicing it.

I agree however, that good memory is possibly sometimes a sign of smartness, since it may show that the person who has it have the abilty to think deeply, which I think is very important. But good memory ususally comes from writing and working hard on memorization, that's why it's hard to tell..

Quote:
 
A good case is a friend of mine, he's fairly intelligent, is into cars and radio shows (he presents a local radio show) but ask him about something you would think to be common knowledge and he just has no idea what you're talking about. Its funny as so far as you have a really good in depth discussion about something that most people know (In this case the general gist of how/why certain stones and metals in jewelry are more expensive that others) but you also feel bad that he doesn't know like everything apart from things about cars and radio stations.


Ironically, your friend sounds a lot like my 56 year old father, who is an Electronics Engineer for many years and doesn't understand very basic things about subjects like Psychology, philosophy and much more, and tends to pull stupid baseless assumptions out of his a***, he also often doesn't know to define the terms he uses and he blames everyone besides himself for the trouble he gets himself to.
Edited by Muhahahaha, Jul 17 2015, 12:59 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Sandy Shore
Default Avatar


Out of curiosity, how many years has your brother got on you?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Muhahahaha
Default Avatar


Lazuli
Jul 17 2015, 12:58 PM
Out of curiosity, how many years has your brother got on you?
What does "got on you" means? Sorry english isn't my mother tongue.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Sandy Shore
Default Avatar


How many years are there between you and him?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
0 users reading this topic
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3

Theme Designed by McKee91