| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Law enforcements | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 1 2014, 03:13 AM (259 Views) | |
| SSJSC | Nov 1 2014, 03:13 AM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Do you think the law enforcement individuals will always try to find a way to get people in trouble nowadays if they're caught of a violation and never give them second chances? If someone is caught of even committing a non-violent crime, they get arrested right away. I have to say that the law enforcements can be too severe sometimes on someone who is not a threat to the community. It's getting expensive to be putting people behind bars who didn't endanger anyone. How much money are we going to waste on prison population in a few years from now? No one should be imprisoned or have a criminal record for non-violent offenses unless their behavior persists and does not stop.
Edited by SSJSC, Nov 1 2014, 03:42 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| + Pelador | Nov 1 2014, 04:05 AM Post #2 |
|
Crazy Awesome Legend
![]()
|
I assume that you mean theft and drugs? They don't tend to get prison sentences unless it's repeat offending or dealing. It's usually a fine and community service. Unless it's a big theft like robbing a post office or something. What else is a non violent crime? Fraud? Fraudsters are f***ing a***** man. They ruin lives. I dunno. I think apart from the occasional overly zealous judge, sentencing is pretty sensible for the most part. |
![]() http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits | |
![]() |
|
| SSJSC | Nov 1 2014, 04:25 AM Post #3 |
![]()
|
One call from the cops or FBI usually scares individuals the first time and forces them to stop their torts. If their behavior persists after that, then yes, arrest them and imprison them. Some people are good people who just needs warnings, that's it. My point is that when they're imprisoning everybody for violating a policy, it's wrong because they could be non-threatening people and don't intend to repeat the offenses ever. Everyone deserves a second chance to turn their life around after one call from the authorities - it also saves the American taxpayers money too. Edited by SSJSC, Nov 1 2014, 04:26 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| + Pyrus | Nov 1 2014, 05:13 AM Post #4 |
![]() ![]()
|
What or who are you basing this off of in specific? Here we don't arrest people right off the bat. It's usually repeat offenders or those who have suspicious or violent records and we have cause to nab 'em. We don't have time or the budget to be wasting on picking up every single person off the streets. |
|
Spoiler: click to toggle
| |
![]() |
|
| + Pelador | Nov 1 2014, 12:36 PM Post #5 |
|
Crazy Awesome Legend
![]()
|
And just because you are arrested for a crime, doesn't mean you automatically end up in jail. Here, for minor crimes you go to a magistrate's court. If you're guilty then they usually fine you or give you community service. At worst then you get a few weeks in a low security prison. Crown court is the serious one here. If you are found guilty in crown court then you're probably going to a real prison for a good while. |
![]() http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:47 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy












4:47 PM Jul 13