| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Feminism vs. Humanism | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 23 2014, 04:56 PM (2,961 Views) | |
| * Yu Narukami | Sep 23 2014, 09:25 PM Post #16 |
|
Izanagi!
![]()
|
So, we just ignore everyone who's finished high school? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 09:30 PM Post #17 |
![]()
|
I'm talking about the restructuring of society if we wanted to fit feminism into the curriculum. Like Strawberry said, there is absolutely no point to "changing the name." That would accomplish nothing. Feminism is feminism. It's a movement loaded with history, and it's a movement that I and plenty of others fully support. It seems to me that only people who are uneducated or misinformed on the matter choose to disregard it. |
![]() |
|
| Strawberry | Sep 23 2014, 09:32 PM Post #18 |
![]()
Chiaroscuro ♥
![]()
|
@Drew I can understand that, but most political movements have been radical, or at the very least seen phases of radicalism at some point to propel their agenda forward. Just like you had society penetrating a negative connotation to the word feminism in our culture, you can have it doing the opposite. As much as I hate to say this, sexism has been very convenient for too long. It was convenient to have a movement fighting for equality of the sexes seen as a bunch of hysterical, men hating, lesbian women acting crazy to seek attention. It was convenient to demean the movement and gradually turning it into a joke because it meant holding onto a platform that perpetuated sexism in a very sneaky way that allowed men to remain more powerful and dignified than women while also making women feel guilty for wanting equality and expressing that desire vocally in society. People still having a problem with the word feminism is still a vestige of that very intricate strategy of diminishing the movement. Erasing the word is giving into that. It's not the solution, it's THE problem. Anyway, getting tired of this topic for now. I may get back to it later. For now I'll agree to disagree with you. Edited by Strawberry, Sep 23 2014, 09:33 PM.
|
![]() ![]() ♪ ♥ ♫ Across The Universe
| |
![]() |
|
| * Yu Narukami | Sep 23 2014, 09:37 PM Post #19 |
|
Izanagi!
![]()
|
Come on now, that's not very fair. Given the current situation with those radicals, imagine how hard it must be for a lot of people to say they're a strong supporter of Feminism. "Feminism? But you're a guy. You fairy." "Feminism? Like those crazy people on the internet?" "They're radicals, they're not feminists" is a legitimate and accurate statement, but it sounds like such a cop-out excuse. I mean, I'd just rather a movement that argues for the same thing but isn't held back by all these issues. If re-educating somebody will transform them into a supporter of Feminism, then it's obvious that the perceived issues around feminism are what's stopping them, not the ideas and principles themselves. Though, I guess I'm just ignorant to the importance of the terminology. @Strawberry - I'd rather give into that and make sure that the principles of Feminism are presented in a more appealing way so that they get the attention that they deserve, but ah well. Edited by Yu Narukami, Sep 23 2014, 09:39 PM.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 09:41 PM Post #20 |
![]()
|
What I'm basically trying to say is that the people who want to change the terminology are the people who happen to be uneducated or misinformed on the matter, so why should we cater to those people? Also, what term would we use? Like I said, feminism is feminism, and if you don't understand that term, you can never possibly translate it to something else. Humanism is not the same term, and it is not a movement, so that obviously doesn't work. |
![]() |
|
| * Yu Narukami | Sep 23 2014, 09:46 PM Post #21 |
|
Izanagi!
![]()
|
How about egalitarianism? Or, heck, a new term? I don't pretend to be informed about the situation at all, but I mean, just think of it like this; Somebody won't try Pepsi because of some negative advertising. The company rebrands Pepsi as 'Cool Cola' The person decides to try it. They're not put off because there wasn't any negative advertising. If people are hugely misinformed about the feminist movement and movements as a whole, they're not going to know that something new is just another movement under a new title. Edited by Yu Narukami, Sep 23 2014, 09:46 PM.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 09:48 PM Post #22 |
![]()
|
I just fail to see the point, and to me it undermines what the feminist movement has already achieved and been struggling with for decades (heck, even centuries). |
![]() |
|
| * Yu Narukami | Sep 23 2014, 09:52 PM Post #23 |
|
Izanagi!
![]()
|
It's not the content that's the problem, it's external factors. The content being the arguments/principles and the external factors being radicals/perceived ideas. It'd just be much easier overall to start a movement with a different name, as it wouldn't have those external factors holding it back. Edit : It's not like forming a new movement would somehow take away a woman's right to vote or anything that's been achieved by the feminism movement in the past. Edited by Yu Narukami, Sep 23 2014, 09:53 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Mihawk | Sep 23 2014, 09:57 PM Post #24 |
![]() ![]()
|
Err... neutralization is a step forward, not backward. It'll encompass all groups that are forming against feminism such as "men's rights" which shouldn't exist on their own.
The new generation doesn't really equate modern feminism with the history behind the name anymore. It's more or less being eradicated already.
That goes both ways though, since just insisting on the word feminism and not trying to bring as many people as possible under gender equality would be working against gender equality too. Focusing on the principles is more important IMO. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Strawberry | Sep 23 2014, 10:03 PM Post #25 |
![]()
Chiaroscuro ♥
![]()
|
Guys. Focusing on the principles while also keeping intact the integrity of the movement is not an illusion. It's a real cause. The cultural construction that ditacted feminism wasn't meant to be seen positively can and IS currently being reserved. It will take time, but it will also honor the people who gave me the right to vote and participate in society. I understand how that doesn't mean a rats a*** to you since you were never a prevalent target, but trust me, it's not a trivial thing. Coca Cola all the way. |
![]() ![]() ♪ ♥ ♫ Across The Universe
| |
![]() |
|
| * Yu Narukami | Sep 23 2014, 10:10 PM Post #26 |
|
Izanagi!
![]()
|
It's not that I 'don't give a rat's ***', it's just that creating a new movement wouldn't be disrespecting those who fought for feminism in the past. It's not like it would suddenly wipe the history of feminist movement from existence, it'd be a kind if 'spiritual successor' to the movement. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 10:15 PM Post #27 |
![]()
|
I still fail to see the point. |
![]() |
|
| Mihawk | Sep 23 2014, 10:16 PM Post #28 |
![]() ![]()
|
Why would changing a name make it lose its integrity? How will changing the name make the feminists who worked for your right make them lose their honor? And how did the argument against renaming feminism lead to you being a victim? I can see the argument for keeping the name intact, it's just not good one when you compare loss vs potential gain. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| * Yu Narukami | Sep 23 2014, 10:16 PM Post #29 |
|
Izanagi!
![]()
|
I've made myself pretty clear at this point, so I don't see the benefit of posting in circles again. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 10:18 PM Post #30 |
![]()
|
Strawberry and I have argued the opposing view pretty well, so I don't see why you keep saying we need to change the name. ![]() There is no point. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:39 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy




















4:39 PM Jul 13