Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 9
Science vs Religion
Topic Started: May 20 2014, 03:18 AM (7,724 Views)
+ Pointer
Member Avatar
...

GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 10:54 AM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 10:17 AM
It is also that weak as religion in terms of PROBLEM SOLVING, if not worse
Sorry, maybe it's because English isn't my native language, but I have no idea what you were trying to say here...

I think you're saying that in terms of problem solving, religion is just as weak as science?
Which is simply not true. Religion creates theories based on nothing, and those theories always consist of something supernatural that in no way can be explained or has ever been witnessed before by anyone.
Science creates theories that are based on objective observations and logical events. Science discovers new things everyday, therefore science is moving forward. Religion is not, they say one thing and they stick with that for 2000 years. That is of course, until science proves it wrong and then they blame it on how god is omnipotent and omniscient and you can't comprehend it.
Quote:
 
Observations, and logical events.


Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino

Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2

Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them

They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.

Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards

This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation

Now and you call It logical and stuff.


Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/

Basically

We dont know a lot of things.

What is black hole? A tear in the space?

We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"

AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.

I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.


Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..


"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....


I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...


Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving

forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
Edited by Pointer, Jun 8 2014, 01:09 PM.

Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ginyu
Member Avatar
Leve Feyenoord 1!

Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino
Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2
Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them
They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.
Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards
This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation
Now and you call It logical and stuff.

Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/
Basically
We dont know a lot of things.
What is black hole? A tear in the space?
We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"
AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.
I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.

Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..
"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....

I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...
Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving
forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
Okay, listen, just because you don't understand quantum mechanics, doesn't mean that it's illogical.
Scientist have studied that for many many years, you can't just expect to make logic out of it by reading a few articles on the internet, neither me or you understands this nor will we ever understand it because we have not studied it.

What we do know however is that these theories are supported by evidence, they are not made up.
And please stick to one enter in your posts, you're spreading the page with your empty lines, it's kinda annoying.

On top of that: I have actually heard about your first example and I just want to add that it was a miscalculation. Science has never disporven E=mc2

Edit: The caps are also annoying in my opinion, if you want to emphasize something please make it bold.
Edited by Ginyu, Jun 8 2014, 01:26 PM.
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
Ask GinyuTokusentai
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Pointer
Member Avatar
...

GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 01:24 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino
Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2
Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them
They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.
Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards
This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation
Now and you call It logical and stuff.

Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/
Basically
We dont know a lot of things.
What is black hole? A tear in the space?
We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"
AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.
I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.

Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..
"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....

I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...
Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving
forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
Okay, listen, just because you don't understand quantum mechanics, doesn't mean that it's illogical.
Scientist have studied that for many many years, you can't just expect to make logic out of it by reading a few articles on the internet, neither me or you understands this nor will we ever understand it because we have not studied it.

What we do know however is that these theories are supported by evidence, they are not made up.
And please stick to one enter in your posts, you're spreading the page with your empty lines, it's kinda annoying.

On top of that: I have actually heard about your first example and I just want to add that it was a miscalculation. Science has never disporven E=mc2
okay you dont like that i made this because i thought it would make the whole a little bit better in terms of reading, But okay i got it.
No you got me wrong i dont mean the braeking E=m*c^2 literally , But back in janua.sedwe... Oh never mind it is okay I am....too tired for proving something to someone ...in the end it wont have any effect, you believe in what you believe. So it is pointless..
Edited by Pointer, Jun 8 2014, 01:32 PM.

Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ssj3vegito96
Member Avatar


How do you guys explain miracles? Like supernatural things happening to people
IT'S CHEESE
Posted Image
Spoiler: click to toggle
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ginyu
Member Avatar
Leve Feyenoord 1!

Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 03:12 PM
How do you guys explain miracles? Like supernatural things happening to people
You're going to need to be a little bit more specific here.
Though most of the times it's one person or two people claiming something happened. In those cases they are most likely lying to get attention or just people hallucinating
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
Ask GinyuTokusentai
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ssj3vegito96
Member Avatar


Both my brothers have had supernatural stuff happen to them. Sounded crazy to me at first since I wasn't there but I believe them
IT'S CHEESE
Posted Image
Spoiler: click to toggle
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ginyu
Member Avatar
Leve Feyenoord 1!

Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 03:43 PM
Both my brothers have had supernatural stuff happen to them. Sounded crazy to me at first since I wasn't there but I believe them
Like i said, you need to be more specific. What happened to them?
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
Ask GinyuTokusentai
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
yokip
Default Avatar


Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 10:54 AM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 10:17 AM
It is also that weak as religion in terms of PROBLEM SOLVING, if not worse
Sorry, maybe it's because English isn't my native language, but I have no idea what you were trying to say here...

I think you're saying that in terms of problem solving, religion is just as weak as science?
Which is simply not true. Religion creates theories based on nothing, and those theories always consist of something supernatural that in no way can be explained or has ever been witnessed before by anyone.
Science creates theories that are based on objective observations and logical events. Science discovers new things everyday, therefore science is moving forward. Religion is not, they say one thing and they stick with that for 2000 years. That is of course, until science proves it wrong and then they blame it on how god is omnipotent and omniscient and you can't comprehend it.
Quote:
 
Observations, and logical events.


Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino

Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2

Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them

They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.

Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards

This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation

Now and you call It logical and stuff.


Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/

Basically

We dont know a lot of things.

What is black hole? A tear in the space?

We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"

AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.

I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.


Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..


"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....


I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...


Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving

forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
1) Most of what you said is made up photons don't even have mass so a neutrino cannot have less mass than a photon because a photon doesn't have any mass to begin with meaning it cannot pass the speed of light.

2) A black hole is a high mass in a packed volume giving it a powerful gravity which bends light around it making it pitch black. Matter is mostly empty space for all the human bodies leaving only electrons and the other subatomic particles, all seven billion human bodies would fit in the space of a sugar cube. How matter (atoms) behaves in a black hole is a mystery still.

3) Everything has an explanation if we don't know it is still there.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Pointer
Member Avatar
...

yokip
Jun 8 2014, 04:20 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 10:54 AM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 10:17 AM
It is also that weak as religion in terms of PROBLEM SOLVING, if not worse
Sorry, maybe it's because English isn't my native language, but I have no idea what you were trying to say here...

I think you're saying that in terms of problem solving, religion is just as weak as science?
Which is simply not true. Religion creates theories based on nothing, and those theories always consist of something supernatural that in no way can be explained or has ever been witnessed before by anyone.
Science creates theories that are based on objective observations and logical events. Science discovers new things everyday, therefore science is moving forward. Religion is not, they say one thing and they stick with that for 2000 years. That is of course, until science proves it wrong and then they blame it on how god is omnipotent and omniscient and you can't comprehend it.
Quote:
 
Observations, and logical events.


Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino

Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2

Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them

They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.

Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards

This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation

Now and you call It logical and stuff.


Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/

Basically

We dont know a lot of things.

What is black hole? A tear in the space?

We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"

AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.

I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.


Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..


"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....


I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...


Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving

forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
1) Most of what you said is made up photons don't even have mass so a neutrino cannot have less mass than a photon because a photon doesn't have any mass to begin with meaning it cannot pass the speed of light.

2) A black hole is a high mass in a packed volume giving it a powerful gravity which bends light around it making it pitch black. Matter is mostly empty space for all the human bodies leaving only electrons and the other subatomic particles, all seven billion human bodies would fit in the space of a sugar cube. How matter (atoms) behaves in a black hole is a mystery still.

3) Everything has an explanation if we don't know it is still there.
photon has no mass? Next thing u will come up with water isnt liquid. Photon has mass, e=m*c'2

Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ssj3vegito96
Member Avatar


GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 03:50 PM
Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 03:43 PM
Both my brothers have had supernatural stuff happen to them. Sounded crazy to me at first since I wasn't there but I believe them
Like i said, you need to be more specific. What happened to them?
My brother always makes the sign of the cross when he gets in his car. Eventually it had become just a habit and he didn't really put much thought into it anymore. One day he realized it and asked something like "give me a reason why I'm doing this" can't remember exactly. A few moments later while he's driving there's water pouring out of his eyes, ears, mouth and nose and he can't stop it. His shirt was soaked and he wasn't crying. It was just water pouring out non stop for a while
IT'S CHEESE
Posted Image
Spoiler: click to toggle
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ginyu
Member Avatar
Leve Feyenoord 1!

Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 04:31 PM
yokip
Jun 8 2014, 04:20 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 10:54 AM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 10:17 AM
It is also that weak as religion in terms of PROBLEM SOLVING, if not worse
Sorry, maybe it's because English isn't my native language, but I have no idea what you were trying to say here...

I think you're saying that in terms of problem solving, religion is just as weak as science?
Which is simply not true. Religion creates theories based on nothing, and those theories always consist of something supernatural that in no way can be explained or has ever been witnessed before by anyone.
Science creates theories that are based on objective observations and logical events. Science discovers new things everyday, therefore science is moving forward. Religion is not, they say one thing and they stick with that for 2000 years. That is of course, until science proves it wrong and then they blame it on how god is omnipotent and omniscient and you can't comprehend it.
Quote:
 
Observations, and logical events.


Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino

Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2

Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them

They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.

Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards

This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation

Now and you call It logical and stuff.


Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/

Basically

We dont know a lot of things.

What is black hole? A tear in the space?

We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"

AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.

I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.


Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..


"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....


I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...


Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving

forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
1) Most of what you said is made up photons don't even have mass so a neutrino cannot have less mass than a photon because a photon doesn't have any mass to begin with meaning it cannot pass the speed of light.

2) A black hole is a high mass in a packed volume giving it a powerful gravity which bends light around it making it pitch black. Matter is mostly empty space for all the human bodies leaving only electrons and the other subatomic particles, all seven billion human bodies would fit in the space of a sugar cube. How matter (atoms) behaves in a black hole is a mystery still.

3) Everything has an explanation if we don't know it is still there.
photon has no mass? Next thing u will come up with water isnt liquid. Photon has mass, e=m*c'2
A photon is indeed massless. And if it does have mass then it's mass is negligible
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
Ask GinyuTokusentai
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
yokip
Default Avatar


Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 04:31 PM
yokip
Jun 8 2014, 04:20 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 10:54 AM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 10:17 AM
It is also that weak as religion in terms of PROBLEM SOLVING, if not worse
Sorry, maybe it's because English isn't my native language, but I have no idea what you were trying to say here...

I think you're saying that in terms of problem solving, religion is just as weak as science?
Which is simply not true. Religion creates theories based on nothing, and those theories always consist of something supernatural that in no way can be explained or has ever been witnessed before by anyone.
Science creates theories that are based on objective observations and logical events. Science discovers new things everyday, therefore science is moving forward. Religion is not, they say one thing and they stick with that for 2000 years. That is of course, until science proves it wrong and then they blame it on how god is omnipotent and omniscient and you can't comprehend it.
Quote:
 
Observations, and logical events.


Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino

Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2

Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them

They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.

Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards

This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation

Now and you call It logical and stuff.


Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/

Basically

We dont know a lot of things.

What is black hole? A tear in the space?

We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"

AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.

I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.


Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..


"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....


I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...


Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving

forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
1) Most of what you said is made up photons don't even have mass so a neutrino cannot have less mass than a photon because a photon doesn't have any mass to begin with meaning it cannot pass the speed of light.

2) A black hole is a high mass in a packed volume giving it a powerful gravity which bends light around it making it pitch black. Matter is mostly empty space for all the human bodies leaving only electrons and the other subatomic particles, all seven billion human bodies would fit in the space of a sugar cube. How matter (atoms) behaves in a black hole is a mystery still.

3) Everything has an explanation if we don't know it is still there.
photon has no mass? Next thing u will come up with water isnt liquid. Photon has mass, e=m*c'2
Light (Photons) has no mass. E = MC2 just means

Some Mass (M) x The Speed that Light Travels (C) = the amount of Energy released.



Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Pointer
Member Avatar
...

yokip
Jun 8 2014, 04:56 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 04:31 PM
yokip
Jun 8 2014, 04:20 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 10:54 AM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 10:17 AM
It is also that weak as religion in terms of PROBLEM SOLVING, if not worse
Sorry, maybe it's because English isn't my native language, but I have no idea what you were trying to say here...

I think you're saying that in terms of problem solving, religion is just as weak as science?
Which is simply not true. Religion creates theories based on nothing, and those theories always consist of something supernatural that in no way can be explained or has ever been witnessed before by anyone.
Science creates theories that are based on objective observations and logical events. Science discovers new things everyday, therefore science is moving forward. Religion is not, they say one thing and they stick with that for 2000 years. That is of course, until science proves it wrong and then they blame it on how god is omnipotent and omniscient and you can't comprehend it.
Quote:
 
Observations, and logical events.


Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino

Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2

Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them

They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.

Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards

This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation

Now and you call It logical and stuff.


Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/

Basically

We dont know a lot of things.

What is black hole? A tear in the space?

We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"

AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.

I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.


Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..


"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....


I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...


Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving

forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
1) Most of what you said is made up photons don't even have mass so a neutrino cannot have less mass than a photon because a photon doesn't have any mass to begin with meaning it cannot pass the speed of light.

2) A black hole is a high mass in a packed volume giving it a powerful gravity which bends light around it making it pitch black. Matter is mostly empty space for all the human bodies leaving only electrons and the other subatomic particles, all seven billion human bodies would fit in the space of a sugar cube. How matter (atoms) behaves in a black hole is a mystery still.

3) Everything has an explanation if we don't know it is still there.
photon has no mass? Next thing u will come up with water isnt liquid. Photon has mass, e=m*c'2
Light (Photons) has no mass. E = MC2 just means

Some Mass (M) x The Speed that Light Travels (C) = the amount of Energy released.



What do you mean by some mass?

Photon doesnt have resting mass it is true but it has momentum So whilst moving it has

:)

YOU ARE WELCOME

Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
yokip
Default Avatar


Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 05:55 PM
yokip
Jun 8 2014, 04:56 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 04:31 PM
yokip
Jun 8 2014, 04:20 PM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 01:03 PM
GinyuTokusentai
Jun 8 2014, 10:54 AM
Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 10:17 AM
It is also that weak as religion in terms of PROBLEM SOLVING, if not worse
Sorry, maybe it's because English isn't my native language, but I have no idea what you were trying to say here...

I think you're saying that in terms of problem solving, religion is just as weak as science?
Which is simply not true. Religion creates theories based on nothing, and those theories always consist of something supernatural that in no way can be explained or has ever been witnessed before by anyone.
Science creates theories that are based on objective observations and logical events. Science discovers new things everyday, therefore science is moving forward. Religion is not, they say one thing and they stick with that for 2000 years. That is of course, until science proves it wrong and then they blame it on how god is omnipotent and omniscient and you can't comprehend it.
Quote:
 
Observations, and logical events.


Okay , here is a single particle : lets say it is subatomic, moreover muon type lets call it neutrino

Okay everyone who has some connect with basic physics now that Energy=mass*Velocity^2

Now according to scientists the speed of neutrino is on par with the speed of light , lets also say we believe them

They also said that the mass of this neutrino is less than a photon.

Meanwhile the energy which had been detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already exceeded the expected standards

This difference is inexplicable, they basically ruin the E=m*Cˇ2 equation

Now and you call It logical and stuff.


Science basics are just theories. /especially in the fields of Physics/

Basically

We dont know a lot of things.

What is black hole? A tear in the space?

We know that appearently quantummechanics is the only "solid" method for us to work with in terms of "exploration in the subatomic fields"

AGAIN I AM NOT SAYIN THAT RELIGION >SCIENCE, BUT IT REALLY DOES BOTHER ME WHENEVER YOU SAY ...OH SCIENCE IS BETTER THAN RELIGION BECAUSE IT IS MOVING FORWARD AND IT IS SOO LOGICAL AND OBJECTIVE.

I suggest you to take a trip in the very deeps of quantummechanics and theoretical physics , we will say what you will say after that.


Our Leading theories are all based upon speculations ..


"what is the photon is ....., what if the black hole is.....what if the strings are.....what if the mass is ......what if what if what if what if what if what if-.....


I know that doesnt really do anything about the topic. People especially people who has no connection of "leading" science thinks that oh science is soo cool and stuff sooner or later we will become the next Asgardian race in the universe with nanotechnology and maybe we will even make dead alive...


Maybe but today's science is nothing but a mess, theories on theories ...what if after what if ...the only science based thing which really moving

forward is electronics and digital electronics....as long as it doesnt reach atomic sized transistors.
1) Most of what you said is made up photons don't even have mass so a neutrino cannot have less mass than a photon because a photon doesn't have any mass to begin with meaning it cannot pass the speed of light.

2) A black hole is a high mass in a packed volume giving it a powerful gravity which bends light around it making it pitch black. Matter is mostly empty space for all the human bodies leaving only electrons and the other subatomic particles, all seven billion human bodies would fit in the space of a sugar cube. How matter (atoms) behaves in a black hole is a mystery still.

3) Everything has an explanation if we don't know it is still there.
photon has no mass? Next thing u will come up with water isnt liquid. Photon has mass, e=m*c'2
Light (Photons) has no mass. E = MC2 just means

Some Mass (M) x The Speed that Light Travels (C) = the amount of Energy released.



What do you mean by some mass?

Photon doesnt have resting mass it is true but it has momentum So whilst moving it has

:)

YOU ARE WELCOME
Rest mass is the familiar mass we know.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Pointer
Member Avatar
...

Quote:
 
Rest mass is the familiar mass we know.
Please describe me a resting Photon.
Edited by Pointer, Jun 8 2014, 07:33 PM.

Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
0 users reading this topic
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 9

Theme Designed by McKee91