Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 10
Science vs Religion
Topic Started: May 20 2014, 03:18 AM (7,722 Views)
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


Quote:
 
Yeah it is a branch yet still you blame the whole Christianity for the past faults of Catolicism

It is like killing the whole village because someone from the street XYZ f***ed a young girl in the next village

You obviously don't know your history. Catholics killed Protestants. Protestants killed Catholics. Both sides are guilty.

Here are some random links for your education on the subject:

http://etb-history-theology.blogspot.com/2012/03/thirty-years-war-and-protestants.html

https://fatherjoe.wordpress.com/instructions/debates/the-inquisition-the-church/protestants-have-killed-many-more-catholics/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_violence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_against_LGBT_people#Religious
Edited by Doggo Champion 2k17, Jun 8 2014, 09:27 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
yokip
Default Avatar


Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 07:32 PM
Quote:
 
Rest mass is the familiar mass we know.
Please describe me a resting Photon.
The photon is a mass less particle. According to theory it has energy and momentum but no mass. Gravity causes mass movement but not for light. Any object with mass exerts a gravitational pull and in doing so curves the space around the object. Light travels around these space curves. In effect bent by gravity. If light had mass, the intensity or brightness of the light would have been reduced as much of the light would have been trapped by the Sun's gravity (light swallowed up by the Sun as appose to bending around the Sun).
Edited by yokip, Jun 8 2014, 09:02 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

Cherry
Jun 8 2014, 09:57 AM
Quote:
 
For example, "Theories" in science aren't just simple opinions made by people. These are accepted facts, but the "theory" part is how the evidence fits together to make the concept work. The Theory of Evolution is an accepted scientific fact because all the evidence points to the process of genetic change from generation to generation, and over thousands or millions of generations, the genes become so different that the organism becomes an entirely different species.


You "proved" your points with the evolution but it does not mean that you proved universally....No

Examples :

Big Bang Theory

M Theory

String Theory

Atomic Theory


They are all just theories Not PROVEN FACTS. FACTS>>THEORIES


String Theory and M Theory are basically the same thing. M Theory is a more detailed version of String Theory, while String Theory is a more broad version of it.

String theory is a theory that is supported by quantum physics, all they need is the data through experimentation to prove its existence.

Atomic Theory is simply the theory that atoms exist. Which has been proven repeatedly as true because you can see them with an atomic microscope, and can see the result of them by looking at spectrums emitted by objects like stars.

Theories are accepted facts because all the evidence suggests it.

Due to the expansion of the Universe, a "Big Bang" as a birth of the Universe is an accepted fact, because that's the evidence that suggests it.
A "Theory" in science is the closest thing that a concept will ever be to being fact. It would only take on valid piece of evidence to prove these theories wrong, and it just hasn't happened.

Theories aren't simply opinions made by people sitting around a book, like a conspiracy theory would be. They take evidence and applicable math and formulate these "opinions" based on that evidence.
Edited by Ketchup Revenge, Jun 8 2014, 11:26 PM.
Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Crashbreaka
Member Avatar
Captain Oblivious

Please remember the point of this thread guys, just talking about science in general seems a little off topic.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ssj3vegito96
Member Avatar


The thing is with the Big Bang, I don't really have much an issue with it, but what was before the Big Bang? Matter can't just be created from nothing. Something beyond science, maybe a god, could've started the Big Bang
Edited by Ssj3vegito96, Jun 8 2014, 11:35 PM.
IT'S CHEESE
Posted Image
Spoiler: click to toggle
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ginyu
Member Avatar
Leve Feyenoord 1!

Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 11:34 PM
The thing is with the Big Bang, I don't really have much an issue with it, but what was before the Big Bang? Matter can't just be created from nothing. Something beyond science, maybe a god, could've started the Big Bang
Then again, what was there before a god? Creationists always say 'every painting has a painter.'
Then tell me: how come god exists? Why is there a god? Wha was there before god?
Religion gives no better answers
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
Ask GinyuTokusentai
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 11:34 PM
The thing is with the Big Bang, I don't really have much an issue with it, but what was before the Big Bang? Matter can't just be created from nothing. Something beyond science, maybe a god, could've started the Big Bang
That much is beyond the understanding of our tiny minds, God is just the simplest solution we can come up with because there just has to have been something, when really there doesn't. The beginning of everything or the realization that everything has just always been is something we can't compute.

Religion got the wrong idea of guessing and enforcing selfish rules and so many people paid for it.
That's what happens when little thought is put in to theory, unlike with scientific theory.


Most religions are from a time of far lesser intelligence they should have no weight in the modern world except for study.
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 11:34 PM
The thing is with the Big Bang, I don't really have much an issue with it, but what was before the Big Bang? Matter can't just be created from nothing. Something beyond science, maybe a god, could've started the Big Bang
According to Stephen Hawking, matter can come from nothing if you understand quantum physics. I don't, so I'm not going to try to explain how this can happen.

And in the context of space-time, there was no "before the Big Bang" because time as science understands it didn't exist before the birth of the universe. The actual passing of time is an illusion that humans have, and the actual passage of time is also influenced by your surroundings.
Time passes faster in orbit than it does on Earth.

The issue with the concept of God is that if something is a mystery, people automatically assume that God did it. God is a forever changing concept that is just beyond our understanding, but the thing that people fail to realize, is that as our knowledge grows, "God" gets smaller and smaller.
Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Crashbreaka
Member Avatar
Captain Oblivious

GinyuTokusentai
Jun 9 2014, 12:13 AM
Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 11:34 PM
The thing is with the Big Bang, I don't really have much an issue with it, but what was before the Big Bang? Matter can't just be created from nothing. Something beyond science, maybe a god, could've started the Big Bang
Then again, what was there before a god? Creationists always say 'every painting has a painter.'
Then tell me: how come god exists? Why is there a god? Wha was there before god?
Religion gives no better answers
I'm not religious, but you're assuming deity's need to follow the rules of science. by definition of what a supernatural being is, a deity could simply have always existed. I don't believe it myself, but still.

---

As for science, as far as I'm concerned it's a way of finding the most probably cause. If something is a scientific fact, it's because all the current evidence points to it, although that also allows for changing facts around when new evidence is presented. It's extremely dynamic, and that's why I generally believe it.

Religion itself is pretty much based on faith from my limited understanding of it. Personally I've never seen the point in it, but most of my friends are religious and I'm not going to question them for it. For all I know, they've had experiences beyond mine. Or maybe we just think differently.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

Crashbreaka
Jun 9 2014, 01:41 AM
GinyuTokusentai
Jun 9 2014, 12:13 AM
Ssj3vegito96
Jun 8 2014, 11:34 PM
The thing is with the Big Bang, I don't really have much an issue with it, but what was before the Big Bang? Matter can't just be created from nothing. Something beyond science, maybe a god, could've started the Big Bang
Then again, what was there before a god? Creationists always say 'every painting has a painter.'
Then tell me: how come god exists? Why is there a god? Wha was there before god?
Religion gives no better answers
I'm not religious, but you're assuming deity's need to follow the rules of science. by definition of what a supernatural being is, a deity could simply have always existed. I don't believe it myself, but still.
I also don't believe in this concept, but I agree with your argument.

A deity may not have to follow the rules, but even if the rules were broken, there would be traces left of things like that happening. For example, there's absolutely no evidence of a global flood in the geologic record. There's a theory from a Christian scientist (of whom I don't recall his name) who offers a possible explanation to this that the pre-flood ocean floor must have sank into the mantle prior to the flood, but the problem with this theory is that it requires a belief in god and miracles in the first place.

And as I've stated, Science's job isn't to disprove anything, it's there to understand the universe.

The thing about science is that it ALWAYS leaves the possibility for doors to be opened, and thinks in the context of understanding the universe, while religion does not. Religion blindly assumes certainties.

Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
p123
Default Avatar


I think religion is awfully silly. There are no promises about anything, as far as we are concerned this is our one and only chance. Dead is dead and try to make this world a better place while you are here.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 10

Theme Designed by McKee91