Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
Social perceptions about sexual pleasure and penis characteristics; (Topic Title Changed)
Topic Started: May 17 2014, 11:12 PM (4,417 Views)
* Yu Narukami Jul 6 2014, 12:53 PM Post #46
Default Avatar
Izanagi!
GinyuTokusentai
Jul 6 2014, 12:50 PM
Ketchup Revenge
Jul 6 2014, 12:44 PM
GinyuTokusentai
Jul 6 2014, 10:28 AM
Was this the topic where we discussed circumcised vs uncircumcised penises?
I think it was. I just found this quote:

"He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord." (Deuteronomy 23:1)

So yeah.... All I can make from this is pretty much Christianity prohibiting circumcision...
Doesn't this quote completely debunk the religious argument for circumcision?
Yes, I remember using this quote in debates with Christians several times.
However, I think that mostly applies to his penis being cut off, not simply the foreskin.
And the "stones" is obviously a reference to the testicles. I know in other translations, this exact passage is translated as "if he has his testicles crushed".
Yes, stones refer to testicles.
Basically if you kick someone in the balls and the balls are slightly damaged, then the victim can't enter the church anymore.
That would be the case. Heck, if you're going to take a literal approach, the damage to the testicles wouldn't even need to be permanent. Unless you interpret 'wounded' as permanently damaged. Even so, you could interpret the privy member as 'any part' a opposed to the entire thing.
Edited by Yu Narukami, Jul 6 2014, 12:55 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge Jul 6 2014, 02:53 PM Post #47
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

 I agree with Snake.
I think the "wounded stones" are referencing permanent damage that causes impotence and mostly sterility. If some guy has his nuts damaged, but is still able to have children, I don't see how anyone would know about his "injury" aside from him because the result would still be the same as a man who didn't have his testicles injured.
Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4

Theme Designed by McKee91