Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Religious Misconceptions
Topic Started: Feb 26 2014, 02:33 AM (1,984 Views)
Herald of the Titans
Default Avatar


DNS look failure, caused double post, sorry.
Edited by Herald of the Titans, Feb 26 2014, 09:37 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


And where have I bashed Christians or used bible quotes out of context exactly...?

This forum is definitely guilty of picking on Christianity. We're the most familiar with it, some of us used to be Christians, and it's the most relevant religion in America today. I don't see a problem with it.

Edit: I figured it was Coolest anyway.
Edited by Doggo Champion 2k17, Feb 26 2014, 01:48 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Volt the Mean
Default Avatar


I remember being in the same position a year ago when I visited Mexico, there was a lot of hate towards any religion not named Christianity or Catholic. Most people that lectured me about these topics over there were so obsessed with their religion that it blinded them, and made them grow anger towards any religion that isn't theirs. But I digress, imo OFG, just move to California, over here no one gives a damn (from what I've seen and I've been living here my entire life).
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

Volt the Mean
Feb 26 2014, 06:30 PM
I remember being in the same position a year ago when I visited Mexico, there was a lot of hate towards any religion not named Christianity or Catholic. Most people that lectured me about these topics over there were so obsessed with their religion that it blinded them, and made them grow anger towards any religion that isn't theirs. But I digress, imo OFG, just move to California, over here no one gives a damn (from what I've seen and I've been living here my entire life).
I live in New England, and despite our colonial history of religious persecution, not too many people here currently give a whole lot of a damn either.
Most people that I've met are either renounced Catholics, Atheists, or simply have no religious views at all. You do get some people that do still go to Church every once in a while, but I know particularly in my area, at least one Baptist church closed because they had no one go in for communion. However, we also have a Pagoda nearby, and some Tibetan Buddhist monks who all live in a house just down the hill from it.

I believe a poll was conducted mapping religious populations in the US, and I believe that my general area was stated to be the least religious out of the continental US. Of course, this was several years ago, so it could be different now. I know California and Alaska aren't too far behind, but it's the mid-west and the deep south which have the highest religious populations.

We have a lot of gay couples who live in my state too. A lot of them have actually moved here from other parts of the US for the fair treatment and ability to marry their spouses.

Herald of the Titans
 
I had to make an account (being a long time browser myself) to reply to this topic, if only to point out a bit of hypocrisy..

I mean no offense by this, but perusing this very debate forum, it seems that the OP is extremely guilty of what he or she is describing. A lot of people, in fact. I can't count how many times (while reading the amusing threads and "debates" posted here) where people that claim to not be Christians post the most outlandish and out of context Bible verses to make their point, when in fact, are completely off the mark and incorrect as to what the passage is referring to or implying.

There also seems to be a lot of "mainstream Christian bashing" that goes on here, too. Most people on this forum view Christians as hateful, judgmental people, who Bible bash and tell gays they're going to hell and that God doesn't love them. This could not be further from the truth, but all you see is what you see on the news and media. Most Christians are not like this, as Jesus Christ definitely did not set that example. Broaden your horizons a bit.

Just saying.

Since you're suspended, I know you can't respond to this, but it's all about perspective of argument. I have not run into a religious member here who isn't Christian, or their personal beliefs originate from Christian values. So "bashing Christianity" really isn't simply me (or people who share my view) zeroing in on Christianity and picking on it. Particularly on a board like this, arguments are about on-topic application to the subject, not simply universal arguments across the board for the heck of it.

It doesn't make sense for me to "bash" a religion if it doesn't apply to anyone, and no one knows what I'm talking about. There's no point if there's no one to give me feedback about the arguments I'm making.
So with that being said, if there were any non-Christian religious folk here, I'm certain I'd be arguing the same points to them, pertaining their religion, but since no one does, there's no point in me even bringing it up.

If you'd like to bring anything from Islam up for the purpose of arguement, I'd be happy to respond to it. But both Christians and Atheists equally believe that everything from Islam is ridiculous, the difference is that Atheists believe this as applicable to all religions.
Edited by Ketchup Revenge, Feb 26 2014, 08:42 PM.
Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Yu Narukami
Default Avatar
Izanagi!

The only time I'll ever care about religion is if it ever endangers life or enters areas where it has no rightful place to be, such as the law. The problem is, debating about religion with somebody who's religious is that you're debating on a stage that they've set, meaning that the audience is going to support them. If you want to debate religion, it's inevitable, necessary, to discuss the legitimacy of the text/teachings that said religion is based on. I'd rather just leave religious people be and not cause any pointless arguments. Why debate people on their terms when you can simply appeal to logic and common sense to solve any problem that arises? Taking jabs at religion when it's not overstepping its grounds is quite immature and isn't really becoming of a person.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Havoc_Wreaker
Default Avatar
Popcorn

pelador, that was fairly accurate good job

fyi, im sikh ^_^
Edited by Havoc_Wreaker, Feb 27 2014, 12:14 AM.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Pelador
Member Avatar
Crazy Awesome Legend

How ballistic would you go if some complete a***** cut your hair in your sleep?

Also, I've read that hair loss is fairly common amongst Sikh men. Is this something you worry about?


Posted Image

http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Havoc_Wreaker
Default Avatar
Popcorn

well depends on the degree on how sikh u really are, basically age old question how religious are u

me personally i go to the temple a few times a month and have religious items and pray ect...

but i dont have long hair nor a turban, but would be still pissed about some strange f*** cutting my hair lol

i have cousins and lots of other family that wear turbans but its not something everyone has

to add that that the fact that im canadian indian and not a sikh living in india

like most relgions it varies on where u live, if u go to india and see sikh people, pretty sure 98 % have turbans but that number elswhere like canada is much lower

as for the hair loss im 99% certain that its affiliated with wearing a turban, reduces ur hair line and cause some baldness
cause wearing a turban 70-90 percent of the day almost every day and the fact that there tight causes hair loss

same as people wearing hats a lot messes with hair line

my dad whos in his mid 50's is part bald in the front but has fairly long and nice hair at the back
my uncle who doesnt wear a turban, is almost 60 and has a nice set of full hair
my grandpa who was 90 when he died even he had hair but similar to my dad, but he also wore a turban

i am in my 20's and dont wear a turban, so im not too worried about baldness
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Pelador
Member Avatar
Crazy Awesome Legend

Most Sikh's here wear turbans and yes I was aware that they can increase the chance of hair loss. I did not now that it wasn't something every Sikh did. That's interesting and actually makes sense if you compare it to other religious people who also aren't strict with their traditiions. For examples Muslims who drink and Jews who eat pork.


Posted Image

http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Havoc_Wreaker
Default Avatar
Popcorn

oh yeah i know a lot of people here wear turbans but at the same time theres a pretty huge chunk who doesnt
i agree its not exactly strict at least not here
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Buuberries
Member Avatar
No

Ketchupis Ultionis
Feb 26 2014, 06:59 AM
Copy_Ninja
Feb 26 2014, 06:40 AM
I think some Atheists are purposely ignorant about Christianity too so they can find it easier to mock. Such as taking quotes out of context and trying to use them in an argument, then outright rejecting any other interpretation of the text. I'm not religious by any means but when people do that it's incredibly frustrating.

I agree for the most part, but even if it's taken out of context, it's still seen to condone certain questionable behaviors or values under the right circumstances. There's no question about that.

For example, slavery is one, even if it's not an indiscriminate and absolute condoning, it still condones actually keeping another human being for servitude. However, the string attached is that it can only be a fellow Jew (this is the Old Testament, so Christianity didn't exist then), and you must allow him to leave your ownership after seven years. I don't know the exact text right off hand, but I believe if he chooses to stay in your employ, you must buy him a wife or something of that nature, and his wife and children are yours as well.

The Bible even condones murder and genocide under certain circumstances, which at face value, seems to violate and contradict the "Thou Shalt Not Kill" commandment. However, there's certain rules that allow it as according to God.

So the Bible does indeed have contradictions, but it does actually usually clarify these circumstances to which it's allowed.
However, on occasion, you will get conflicting stories. Sometimes it can be explained by the fact that not all scriptures that were considered holy were actually put into the Bible. In addition to this, phrase meanings got lost in translation, and you do get some that don't make a whole lot of sense at all and do blatantly contradict not only the word of God, but the other texts as well.
Going back to the texts that were left out, The Gospel of Judas is one that was left out.

Therefore even if the Bible is the "word of god", it's not the full word of God due to censorship from the church when these texts were compiled into an actual book, which wasn't until around year 700.
this is like the umpteenth time ive reposted this on this forum, but some ppl just dont seem to understand it.

The Bible isn't simply a set of laws by which we all have to abide. It's a two-part story that depicts mankind's fall and condemnation, and its redemption through Jesus Christ. The Ten Commandments are God's eternal laws that all Christians are commanded to follow. The specific applications of the Ten Commandments, as given to the Israelites in Leviticus, the book everyone just looooveeeeessss to quote and misinterpret, show two things: they were designed to distinguish the Israelites from the other nations around them; more importantly, they were meant to show the impossibility of keeping the Ten Commandments perfectly and demonstrate the need for a savior, Jesus Christ, who is prophesied throughout the Old Testament. When he did come down to Earth, he fulfilled the law by keeping the Ten Commandments perfectly and subsequently dying for the sins of mankind. By doing so he saved mankind from being condemned for their failure to follow the Commandments. He still commands mankind to follow them, and he gave them a new set of guidelines (not so much strict laws like the Old Testament one) in his Sermon on the Mount and others, but failure to follow them does not condemn them, since they're saved by God and not by their own works.
¯\(°_o)/¯
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

Buuberries
Mar 1 2014, 01:51 AM
this is like the umpteenth time ive reposted this on this forum, but some ppl just dont seem to understand it.

The Bible isn't simply a set of laws by which we all have to abide. It's a two-part story that depicts mankind's fall and condemnation, and its redemption through Jesus Christ. The Ten Commandments are God's eternal laws that all Christians are commanded to follow.
The problem with that logic is technically the Ten Commandments are Jewish Laws, not actually Christian ones. Jesus himself didn't mention anything about them, except for the general statement that all the previous laws had to still be followed.
Therefore just tossing this out there, but any Christian who says that the Old Testament doesn't apply to them clearly has never read the Bible.
The Ten Commandments were written well before Christianity ever existed, or the New Testament. They exist in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)... so if you want to be specific, "Thou shalt keep holy the Sabbath" is the Jewish Sabbath, which is Friday into Saturday, not the Christian one, which is on Sunday.

Quote:
 
The specific applications of the Ten Commandments, as given to the Israelites in Leviticus, the book everyone just looooveeeeessss to quote and misinterpret, show two things: they were designed to distinguish the Israelites from the other nations around them; more importantly, they were meant to show the impossibility of keeping the Ten Commandments perfectly and demonstrate the need for a savior, Jesus Christ, who is prophesied throughout the Old Testament. When he did come down to Earth, he fulfilled the law by keeping the Ten Commandments perfectly and subsequently dying for the sins of mankind. By doing so he saved mankind from being condemned for their failure to follow the Commandments. He still commands mankind to follow them, and he gave them a new set of guidelines (not so much strict laws like the Old Testament one) in his Sermon on the Mount and others, but failure to follow them does not condemn them, since they're saved by God and not by their own works.
The Old Testament makes plenty of references to a messiah, but many of those prophecies were wrong as well.
There's plenty of prophecies that were never full-filled by Jesus; so I don't know how you can make that conclusion.

Quote:
 
Isaiah 7:14
Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

The Book of Matthew cites the virgin who bore a son (technically the actual translation of the Hebrew word "almah" is "young maiden", not "virgin"). However, The Book of Matthew completely ignores the child's name in the prophecy. Last time I checked, Jesus wasn't called Immanuel at any time, ever.

Quote:
 
Micah 5:2
But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting

This verse is prophecising the birth of Jesus, and the Book of Matthew credits this as confirmation that Jesus was the Messiah being that he was born in Bethlehem, but the problem with this verse is that "Bethlehem Ephratah" was a tribe of Jews, not the name of a city.

Quote:
 
Micah 5:6
And they shall waste the land of Assyria with the sword, and the land of Nimrod in the entrances thereof: thus shall he deliver us from the Assyrian, when he cometh into our land, and when he treadeth within our borders.

Putting it simply, Jesus never did any of these things.

There's plenty of others that I could list that were false prophecies and/or failed prophecies, but putting it simply at this time, I'm too lazy to look them up.
Edited by Ketchup Revenge, Mar 1 2014, 06:00 AM.
Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Buuberries
Member Avatar
No

what was their culture like over there and back then? cuz im p sure it aint similar to what we know. names were probably more descriptive. if you take a look at the meaning of immanuel, it means god is with us according to a google search.

not seeing anything about a tribe of jews w/ my searches.

no clue about the third one, but it could be referring to his second coming (ho ho ho)?


anyway, you've clearly missed my point if you're picking up on those. you referred to god's laws in your post -- e.g., the bible condoning murder and genocide... to quote you: "The Bible even condones murder and genocide under certain circumstances [...]"
can't remember if it was you or other people from last year, but plenty of other passages from the old testament are also referred to such as not wearing clothing made of wool and linen woven together (deutronomy something something), teenagers being rebellious should be killed (deutronomy), slavery being condoned (levicticus and exodus), cursing one's parents should be punishable by death (levicticus), and so on.
all of those laws were created by the israelites as a way of applying the ten commandments. they were specific to the israelites back then, but were abolished when jesus came around and did his thing.

that's my point. so many people have the idea that everything mentioned in the bible is a law when really it's just misinterpreted -- as i've mentioned at least half a dozen times on various threads, it depicts mankinds downfall and redemption.

i'm still an agnostic atheist btw; i haven't converted over the past few weeks/months i haven't been on. i was just lurking and saw misconceptions in a religious misconceptions thread and was drawn in. ukno how it is.
¯\(°_o)/¯
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lunar2
Member Avatar


Buuberries
Mar 1 2014, 07:45 AM
what was their culture like over there and back then? cuz im p sure it aint similar to what we know. names were probably more descriptive. if you take a look at the meaning of immanuel, it means god is with us according to a google search.

not seeing anything about a tribe of jews w/ my searches.

no clue about the third one, but it could be referring to his second coming (ho ho ho)?


anyway, you've clearly missed my point if you're picking up on those. you referred to god's laws in your post -- e.g., the bible condoning murder and genocide... to quote you: "The Bible even condones murder and genocide under certain circumstances [...]"
can't remember if it was you or other people from last year, but plenty of other passages from the old testament are also referred to such as not wearing clothing made of wool and linen woven together (deutronomy something something), teenagers being rebellious should be killed (deutronomy), slavery being condoned (levicticus and exodus), cursing one's parents should be punishable by death (levicticus), and so on.
all of those laws were created by the israelites as a way of applying the ten commandments. they were specific to the israelites back then, but were abolished when jesus came around and did his thing.

that's my point. so many people have the idea that everything mentioned in the bible is a law when really it's just misinterpreted -- as i've mentioned at least half a dozen times on various threads, it depicts mankinds downfall and redemption.

i'm still an agnostic atheist btw; i haven't converted over the past few weeks/months i haven't been on. i was just lurking and saw misconceptions in a religious misconceptions thread and was drawn in. ukno how it is.
except you are wrong. all those laws were not interpretations of the ten commandments. many of them were given before the ten commandments. the ten commandments were just 10 of the laws handed down by god. they were not special or central in any way except in the method that they were delivered.

also, jesus did not do away with the old laws. he specifically stated that they were still in effect.

matthew 5:17-20
 
Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
18 For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled.
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the Kingdom of Heaven; but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven.
20 For I say unto you that unless your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.


yes, jesus fulfilled the sacrifices, but the behavioral laws of the old testament are still in effect according to the bible, and will be until the end. you still can't wear clothing on mixed fabric, you are still supposed to be stoned to death if you work between sunset on friday and sunset on saturday, etc., etc.

don't try to defend the bible, because it can't be defended. god ordered multiple genocides. god directly interfered with pharoah's free will so that he could work some miracles, and then punished the egyptians for what he forced pharoah to do. god allowed satan to murder dozens of job's servants, and all 10 of his kids, over a f***ing bet that he already knew the outcome of, and then had the nerve to try to cow job into submission when job questioned his reasoning. yeah, this is a book that can't be defended on any issue.
list of canon sources:

the DB manga, and the Dr. Slump manga as it applies to the crossover during the rra saga.

list of non canon sources:

everything else, regardless of origin, format, or quality.

for those that blindly follow word of god
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Buuberries
Member Avatar
No

galatians 3:13. k
¯\(°_o)/¯
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
0 users reading this topic
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums with no limits on posts or members.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2

Theme Designed by McKee91