Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Creationism vs Evolution in Public Schools; The debate continues
Topic Started: Jan 19 2014, 09:57 PM (1,119,669 Views)
SaiyanHajime
Member Avatar


Whilst most Christians believe that God created the universe, they do not disbelieve in evolution. Creationism is rejection of evolution. It's the belief that, prior to the sins Eve committed, all life on Earth that has ever existed lived together in harmony eating plant matter. It's the belief that Noah's ark really did happen and explains the fossil record. It's the belief that the Earth is only 5000 or so years old. It's extremist. And it's certainly not "the norm" in the USA, I'd say that's pretty insulting to Americans... Even of those who do not accept evolution in it's entirety, most are not "creationists". It's fairly common for people to accept evolution, but NOT accept human evolution, for example. It's more common still for people to simply say they don't know/care.
Twitter | deviantArt | Tumblr
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


SaiyanHajime
Jan 21 2014, 10:32 PM
Whilst most Christians believe that God created the universe, they do not disbelieve in evolution. Creationism is rejection of evolution. It's the belief that, prior to the sins Eve committed, all life on Earth that has ever existed lived together in harmony eating plant matter. It's the belief that Noah's ark really did happen and explains the fossil record. It's the belief that the Earth is only 5000 or so years old. It's extremist. And it's certainly not "the norm" in the USA, I'd say that's pretty insulting to Americans... Even of those who do not accept evolution in it's entirety, most are not "creationists". It's fairly common for people to accept evolution, but NOT accept human evolution, for example. It's more common still for people to simply say they don't know/care.
Why do you define creationism as all those things? The bible may say those things, but that isn't creationism. Creationism is in the bible, but the bible and the idea of creationism itself are separate.

Creationism doesn't even need to be attached to Christianity. It's a popular belief among religions - Mormons, Muslims, Jews, etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism
Edited by Doggo Champion 2k17, Jan 21 2014, 11:01 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Pelador
Member Avatar
Crazy Awesome Legend

I assume when you say most Christians that you are getting your data from a reliable survey or study? I mean it would be pretty stupid to just make up generalisations about entire groups of people right?


Posted Image

http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Mitas
Member Avatar
It truly was a Shawshank redemption

SaiyanHajime, you clearly are unable to put aside your bias against creationism in this argument. Every one of your posts talks about how ridiculous it is, how extreme it is and how we shouldn't even entertain the idea of teaching it because it's so god damn ridiculous. That's your view. That's not the view of everyone. People are allowed to form their own opinions on it, and to do so it needs to be taught. Your attitude towards creationism is just as bad as the die-hard Christians: in both cases, views are being pushed onto people (creationism with Christians, the idea that Creationism is ridiculous an extremism by yourself).

I shall repeat myself. In no way can a logical argument be made that people should not be given the choice to learn about religion, including creationism.
Posted Image
"Then you've got the chance to do better next time."
"Next time?"
"Course. Doing better next time. That's what life is."
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SaiyanHajime
Member Avatar


Okay, lets rewind.

Quote:
 
Why do you define creationism as all those things?

Because that is the creationism this thread is discussing. Also, from the wiki article you linked to "In 1929 in the United States, the term "creationism" first became associated with Christian fundamentalists, specifically with their rejection of human evolution and belief in a young Earth—although this usage was contested by other groups, such as old Earth creationists and evolutionary creationists, who hold different concepts of creation.[3][4][5]" The fact this even needed to be said and that "this usage is contested" clearly implies that "creationism" typically though not always refers to the definition I gave in the prior post.

Quote:
 
Creationism doesn't even need to be attached to Christianity. It's a popular belief among religions - Mormons, Muslims, Jews, etc.

Again, "creationism" typically refers to the Christian extremist belief I defined previously. The kind you find on creationism.org and answersingenesis.org etc.

Personally, I think the majority of you are misunderstanding what "creationism" in the context of this topic actually means. The whole "creationism vs evolution" debate re schooling is very specifically referring to something you guys don't seem to realise it is.

Should generalised creation stories and religion be taught in schools? Yes. Should extremist Christian creationism? No.

Quote:
 
I assume when you say most Christians that you are getting your data from a reliable survey or study? I mean it would be pretty stupid to just make up generalisations about entire groups of people right?

Who's this addressed to? ObsessiveFanGirl for saying creationism is the norm in the USA, or me for simply saying that's clearly not true?

And sure, why not, lets look at some studies.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/30/evolution-survey_n_4519441.html
http://www.gallup.com/poll/21814/evolution-creationism-intelligent-design.aspx

And btw sorry if my italics offend you.

Quote:
 
SaiyanHajime, you clearly are unable to put aside your bias against creationism in this argument. Every one of your posts talks about how ridiculous it is, how extreme it is and how we shouldn't even entertain the idea of teaching it because it's so god damn ridiculous. That's your view. That's not the view of everyone. People are allowed to form their own opinions on it, and to do so it needs to be taught. Your attitude towards creationism is just as bad as the die-hard Christians: in both cases, views are being pushed onto people (creationism with Christians, the idea that Creationism is ridiculous an extremism by yourself).

I shall repeat myself. In no way can a logical argument be made that people should not be given the choice to learn about religion, including creationism.

I'm not saying what you think I'm saying. :( I dunno where you think I've implied that people shouldn't have the choice to learn about whatever they wish. My argument is simply that creationism (as defined in my previous post) shouldn't be taught in pre elective classes at all, because there's more important things to spend valuable education time on.

And again, I think you guys misunderstand, as someone else highlighted, what creationism actually is. Or rather, what this topic is discussing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy



Twitter | deviantArt | Tumblr
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


Your argument would be valid if you actually knew what kind of creationism schools teach. I've never heard of a school teaching the creationism that you're talking about as if it were fact - or even at all, for that matter.

Creationism is the norm in America.

http://religions.pewforum.org/reports
Edited by Doggo Champion 2k17, Jan 22 2014, 12:21 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SaiyanHajime
Member Avatar


As I'm sure you appreciate, that's a pretty long read the link you posted. XD I ctrl+f for evolution, creation and origin and none of them came up. Does it say anywhere words to effect that imply more than 50% of Americans deny evolution?

Most Americans are Christian, sure, no one argues that. It's whether those Christians deny evolution that's the question. The majority don't. A lot DO, a scarily high number impo... As seen in the links I posted, but most do not.

The question is not regarding what's currently taught in schools, it's regarding what should or should not be taught in schools.

Regardless... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education_in_the_United_States

"...Louisiana and Mississippi, have adopted legislation allowing teachers and students to discuss scientific evidence critical of evolution.[1]"

Note there is none. By that they mean Biblical evidence portrayed as science, like that found on answersingenesis.org Thats the kind of creationism I'm talking about and it's dangerous.

The crap I'm talking about though is this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education_in_the_United_States#Movements_to_teach_creationism_in_schools
Twitter | deviantArt | Tumblr
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


Quote:
 
As I'm sure you appreciate, that's a pretty long read the link you posted. XD I ctrl+f for evolution, creation and origin and none of them came up. Does it say anywhere words to effect that imply more than 50% of Americans deny evolution?

I never claimed that more than 50% of American deny evolution. Creationism has nothing to do with evolution. The universe wasn't created by evolution.

Quote:
 
Most Americans are Christian, sure, no one argues that. It's whether those Christians deny evolution that's the question. The majority don't. A lot DO, a scarily high number impo... As seen in the links I posted, but most do not.

Yeah, it is scary, but that still has nothing to do with this.

Quote:
 
The question is not regarding what's currently taught in schools, it's regarding what should or should not be taught in schools.

Regardless... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education_in_the_United_States

"...Louisiana and Mississippi, have adopted legislation allowing teachers and students to discuss scientific evidence critical of evolution.[1]"

Note there is none. By that they mean Biblical evidence portrayed as science, like that found on answersingenesis.org Thats the kind of creationism I'm talking about and it's dangerous.

The crap I'm talking about though is this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education_in_the_United_States#Movements_to_teach_creationism_in_schools

I agree.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SaiyanHajime
Member Avatar


Quote:
 
I never claimed that more than 50% of American deny evolution. Creationism has nothing to do with evolution. The universe wasn't created by evolution.

Ha! Well indeed, literally speaking, but that's not what "creationism" means, as I keep saying. ;)

The issue here is that we simply don't agree on the definition of "creationism".

Quote:
 
...but that still has nothing to do with this.

Yessssss but it doeeees though. Because look at what this topic is actually about. Look at the title and the first post. The kind of creationism this topic started talking about is the anti-evolution kind, not the widely held belief across religions, continents and cultures that a god of some sort created the universe in some way.
Edited by SaiyanHajime, Jan 22 2014, 01:07 AM.
Twitter | deviantArt | Tumblr
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


Ketchupis Ultionis
Jan 19 2014, 09:57 PM
This is a big issue in the US, and has been one for years. Should Creationism be taught in science class in schools? Should evolution be taught in school? Both or neither?

I don't have a problem with Creationism being taught in schools, but teach it as a electoral Theology or Social Science class, not try to implement it as an actual scientific one. However, my main issue is that they only want the Christian account of Creationism taught in Schools.

There is absolutely no scientific evidence at all to support the Christian account of Creationism, and that account in no way has been proven to be more valid than any other religion's account of Creationism.

Science class is about studying universal and verifiable data, not go off on some charade about what we think we believe because some unverified book tells us so.
Anti-evolution was never mentioned.

What more do I have to say...?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SaiyanHajime
Member Avatar


??

Creationism vs Evolution in Public Schools; The debate continues
Twitter | deviantArt | Tumblr
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


That doesn't mean that they are two opposing ideas. I understand that there is obviously a debate about whether both evolution and creationism should be taught in schools, but that doesn't mean that the ideas contradict each other. You're making little sense here, to me at least.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SaiyanHajime
Member Avatar


I see. Well, the controversy surrounding the creationism/evolution in schools debate is very much about them being opposing ideas. In this context, it does mean they are opposing ideas, I'm afraid. If they weren't, why band them together at all? Like you rightly pointed out, how the universe was initially created has nothing to do with evolution. This topic is about that last link I posted. It is about creationism as an opposing, alternative explanation to evolution, and whether or not it deserves to be taught in schools alongside evolution in the name of balance.
Edited by SaiyanHajime, Jan 22 2014, 01:34 AM.
Twitter | deviantArt | Tumblr
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


If you want that to be what this topic is about, then I suppose I can ignore everything else and go off of that.

If we are treating them as two opposing ideas, they both should still be taught; however, they should be taught in different settings. If we're talking about a Christian/Catholic school, it's obvious that the school would be biased anyway, so I don't have a problem there. If we're referring to public schools, I believe that evolution should be taught in science classes, and creationism should either be an elective or taught along with a history course of some kind (in the proper context).
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SaiyanHajime
Member Avatar


Not really about what I want, it's about what is, but sure, if you want to call it that. ;)
Twitter | deviantArt | Tumblr
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91