Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Toriyama and Nameks
Topic Started: Jan 18 2014, 02:28 AM (720 Views)
SSJ
Member Avatar


Do you think he screwed up their design in Dragonball Z? Consider Piccolo Daimao was a Namek, and his children looked far from Namekians, why do you think Toriyama went away from this in Z? Why did he make them all look the same when Daimao's children showed us that they shouldn't have really looked like that.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheGmGoken
Member Avatar


Piccolo's children was more or less demons not Namkeians...well full blown namekians.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Emmeth
Member Avatar
I Yoeri

Toriyama hadn't planned on Piccolo being namekian. At the time, he was just a demon who could spew out children.
Posted Image
My Twitch Page
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SSJ
Member Avatar


But did he not create them the same way he create Ma Junior? I don't recall anything being said about the old children being made differently. When a Namek offspring hatches from an egg, it should still be a Namekian.

@Emmeth: Sure, but then why would he stray away from that? Nameks all hatch from eggs which I'm assuming Daimao's children did, so he could have at least had some variety later on.
Edited by SSJ, Jan 18 2014, 02:54 AM.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Emmeth
Member Avatar
I Yoeri

SuperSaiyan2
Jan 18 2014, 02:53 AM
@Emmeth: Sure, but then why would he stray away from that? Nameks all hatch from eggs which I'm assuming Daimao's children did, so he could have at least had some variety later on.
I guess he saw them being aliens as a better plot-path.
Posted Image
My Twitch Page
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Vertical
Member Avatar


Piccolo Junior has magic to make clothes.

Piccolo Senior can have magic to make demons... or at least possibly corrupt his own Namekian eggs.
DeviantART
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

SuperSaiyan2
Jan 18 2014, 02:28 AM
Do you think he screwed up their design in Dragonball Z? Consider Piccolo Daimao was a Namek, and his children looked far from Namekians, why do you think Toriyama went away from this in Z? Why did he make them all look the same when Daimao's children showed us that they shouldn't have really looked like that.
Techincally, it could be viewed that way, but I don't really think Toriyama screwed up at all. I think he knew perfectly well what he was doing, but decided to ignore it.

It all has to do with the context of the story that that moment in time. Piccolo Daimao when he was first introduced was not an alien being, but an Earthly demon.
Toriyama mentioned in an interview that he was writing by the seat of his pants. In other words, a lot of the stuff that happened in the series wasn't planned out. He simply came up with the story as he was releasing the chapters. However, writing in this manner unfortunately is completely prone to major plot holes happening. I can think of several off the top of my head. This, of course, being one of them.
This also could explain why he forgot certain things in the series. However, in contrast, I think this had a lot to do with laziness. He simply didn't want to continue with certain aspects, so he simply scrapped them and later forgot about them.

For example, I'm under the firm belief that Toriyama simply got lazy and didn't want to draw tails anymore, not that he "forgot" as he stated. Evidence to this is that for several years he drew a tail on his main character. How can you forget tails if your main character had one for several years?
Other evidence to this is that he designed both Broly (yes, he designed Broly) and SSj3 Goku with tails (initial sketches). With Broly, he released a note to Toei where he said that it didn't make a difference if they animated Broly with a tail or not. These two designs occurred well after tails had been eradicated from the series. Also we have to consider that drawing a tail on one character is one thing, but four (Gohan, Vegeta, Trunks, Goten) (In addition to Future Trunks, makes 5).

That can get tiresome. Back to the Piccolo subject, as I said, he was a demon in that context at that time, not an alien. This is the same reason why he never regenerated his body until Piccolo jr. was born.
Edited by Ketchup Revenge, Jan 18 2014, 03:19 AM.
Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Kaboom
Member Avatar


Presumably, the retroactive reason for why King Piccolo's spawn looked the way they did because A) they were evil demon-spawn, and B) King Piccolo himself was an incomplete Namekian at the time.

I'm pretty sure that's the OFFICIAL explanation from some source, but I can't remember for sure right now.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Professor Gohan
Default Avatar


I go with mutated spawn. I don't see a big deal and being capable of doing something like that, especially if they're coming from someone who by definition isn't your full, everyday Namek that you see.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Dragon Slayer
Member Avatar
Feel like a sir

Just like Prof Gohan said,they're mutated.
Piccolo jr is supposed to be his reincarnation,hence the resemblance.
Spoiler: click to toggle

Spoiler: click to toggle
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Ketchup Revenge
Member Avatar
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

Professor Gohan
Jan 18 2014, 02:01 PM
I go with mutated spawn. I don't see a big deal and being capable of doing something like that, especially if they're coming from someone who by definition isn't your full, everyday Namek that you see.
Indeed. And Piccolo Daimao is special because he's concentrated evil, and only half of a whole being.

If you want to take his reproductive ability into context with the rest of the Nameks, there's nothing that states that offspring like that couldn't happen.

Unless of course, Namekians need to go into the reproductive phase by intentionally wanting to clone themselves. This could explain the discrepancy between the two.
Edited by Ketchup Revenge, Jan 18 2014, 03:39 PM.
Posted Image
The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Baron Samedi
Member Avatar


I like to think that Piccolo had control over appearance and chose more Demon looking spawn for two reasons. 1.To cause fear in appearance. 2. To have destinguishment between the minions and the King.
Obviously that's conjecture to make it work in my head, like previously styrd the real reason is that Piccolo wasn't thought of as a Namekian.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Alex D. Boss
Member Avatar


Piccolo's babies were more like demons / Dinasaurs type dudes. When AT came up with an idea about Piccolo's own race , he decided to add Piccolo type namekians , it makes more sense.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
« Previous Topic · Dragon Ball/Z Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91