| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| America: Hope of the "rights", not what's "right"? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 22 2013, 11:11 PM (862 Views) | |
|
|
Dec 22 2013, 11:11 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Perusing the news, hearing/seeing various things going on in this country, realizing what people consider important or "hot topics", I am really confused. It seems that Americans are more worried about their rights than what's right. And those are two very different things, and a scary thought when one chosen over the other. Federal funding for Veterans retirement gets cut by 7 billion dollars, no one even comments. But Phil Robertson gives his personal opinion on a subject very dear and close to him (his right as an American, which entitles him to Freedom of Speech) and everyone loses their mind. Babies across the planet are being murdered before they are born and even nearly fully developed in abortion clinics. But say it's not the "right" thing to do and women across the globe scream out it's their "right" to murder their own children. 6 year old African American daughter blocks gunman from murdering her mother and takes 7 shots, lives, and no news room across the globe covers the story. Gay rights @6, however. Backwards? I really think so. |
![]() |
|
| * Mitas | Dec 22 2013, 11:26 PM Post #2 |
![]()
It truly was a Shawshank redemption
![]()
|
My counter to this would be: if no news outlets are covering these stories then how did you hear about them? |
|
"Then you've got the chance to do better next time." "Next time?" "Course. Doing better next time. That's what life is." | |
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 22 2013, 11:56 PM Post #3 |
![]()
|
Do you really think that big news media is the only viable source of information? If you really think that, you probably have no idea what's actually going on outside of your neighborhood. |
![]() |
|
| * Mitas | Dec 23 2013, 12:01 AM Post #4 |
![]()
It truly was a Shawshank redemption
![]()
|
I don't think that, don't put words into my mouth. You actually said "6 year old African American daughter blocks gunman from murdering her mother and takes 7 shots, lives, and no news room across the globe covers the story. Gay rights @6, however." A news outlet had to cover it for you to hear it. My point was that your topic was about how America doesn't seem to care about these stories. That's not true. There are news outlets covering these stories. You just have to look a little harder. And btw, big news media doesn't cover the news in your local area. That's small, local news outlets. Edited by Mitas, Dec 23 2013, 12:02 AM.
|
|
"Then you've got the chance to do better next time." "Next time?" "Course. Doing better next time. That's what life is." | |
![]() |
|
| + Pelador | Dec 23 2013, 12:09 AM Post #5 |
|
Crazy Awesome Legend
![]()
|
Unless it's a major story like the President is in town or someone blew up a hospital. |
![]() http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits | |
![]() |
|
| Buuberries | Dec 23 2013, 03:15 AM Post #6 |
![]()
No
![]()
|
it seems that you have a pro-life view yet the whole argument for that is whether or not the foetus has the right to live vs the mother's choice. what's right isn't necessarily black and white; at least when it comes to some issues such as abortion, there isn't a universal law that dictates that a certain option is right or wrong. |
| ¯\(°_o)/¯ | |
![]() |
|
| EMIYA | Dec 23 2013, 03:31 AM Post #7 |
|
"I am the bone of my sword."
![]()
|
As a note of advice, if your going make a Deep Discussion Topic, either try to remain neutral or if you want to pick side, make sure its backed up by reasonable claims without bashing the other subject. Saying "murdered babies" only comes off as incredibly biased as well as your last line where it seems you think getting news reel for a surviving child is more important than Gay Rights. In fact your entire topic is basically hypocrisy from what I can see. You act as if American's should seek out what is "right" and not what they want but clearly this is about what you want. Edited by EMIYA, Dec 23 2013, 03:32 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Copy_Ninja | Dec 23 2013, 03:43 AM Post #8 |
![]()
Novacane for the pain
![]()
|
Yes, those stories deserve to get more coverage than they currently get to be sure. Yet, that doesn't mean any of the other stuff doesn't deserve a mention either. Yes, Phil Robertson is allowed to say what he wants. Conversely, others are allowed to call him a homophobic a***** for expressing those views due to the same freedom of speech. People are constantly mixing this argument up. No one denied his right to say it, it's the content of what he said that's being (rightly) attacked. Abortion is a messy topic, but simply saying mothers are murdering their babies as if that's the only correct view and everyone should agree with it is ridiculous. Just because you believe it's wrong doesn't make it so. Gay rights is still an issue and gay people are fighting for equality. It might not be important to you but it's important to many others and deserves attention. Instead of complaining about legitimate issues that are in the news, maybe you should have focused on the obsession with celebrity that fills newspapers and magazines and things like that. |
We'll never be those kids again
| |
![]() |
|
| + Pelador | Dec 23 2013, 03:52 AM Post #9 |
|
Crazy Awesome Legend
![]()
|
Well I don't know about that. I find all the celebrity stuff really interesting and I think there's definitely a place for it. However I also agree that it shouldn't over shadow more important news. I don't think it does for the most part unless somebody really famous dies or gets arrested. |
![]() http://www.youtube.com/user/jonjits | |
![]() |
|
| Daemon Keido | Dec 23 2013, 04:15 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Warmaster of Chaos
![]()
|
When all the news a major news group focuses on is based on what a celebrity is doing, I am annoyed. It does have a time and place: the Entertainment part of the news program. Don't have a large enough timeslot to cover everything? Create a seperate show, one focused on the entertainers of the world. |
A Shadow is merely Darkness in the presence of Light![]() Thanks Kid Buu for this awesome sig! The Emperor Protects | |
![]() |
|
| Rockman | Dec 25 2013, 02:58 AM Post #11 |
![]()
hoighty-toighty
![]()
|
Key words. YOU really think so. But thanks for your opinion on the matter. |
![]() JAke is a copyright of Spazo and Pickle Flavored Fudge Pops inc. | |
![]() |
|
| * Ketchup Revenge | Dec 25 2013, 11:29 PM Post #12 |
![]()
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
![]()
|
I strongly agree, but there's one point that you're missing entirely. I understand you've been suspended, but in case you're still reading this, you need to understand that "Freedom of Speech" is exclusive to legal prosecution, not contractual. In other words, Phil Robertson can't be arrested or prosecuted for what he says, but that doesn't mean that he can just go and talk about anything willy-nilly. This the same reason why a person in the US can't talk about any sex-based opinions in the workplace and not be punished for it if someone gets offended. If Phil Robertson agreed to not speak about those types of things while employed by A&E by signing a contract, they are legally able to do whatever they want with him if he violates that contract. This is of course limited to them terminating his employment with them.
That really depends on if you actually consider a fetus as an actual person. I personally don't, because they can be frozen like a pizza and not actually die during that process. They can't develop or survive outside of a host (a woman) (up to a certain point, of course), therefore they are actually classified as more of a parasite than a person according to my understanding of biology. I'm not saying that it's right, because most of the reasons for abortion are simply dumb irresponsibility, but at least think about trying something different than simple termination.
Not the point. There's only so much you can talk about with a little girl nearly dying over saving her mother, while Gay Rights is far more complex morally and politically than that because it effects a large percentage of people. Edited by Ketchup Revenge, Dec 25 2013, 11:31 PM.
|
![]() The vengeance is her's for as long as she stands by Him. | |
![]() |
|
| 0 users reading this topic | |
| « Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:46 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


























4:46 PM Jul 13