| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Week 5 Discussion | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 2 2013, 03:57 AM (2,157 Views) | |
| + Rebel X | Oct 2 2013, 03:57 AM Post #1 |
![]() ![]()
|
Let's get it on. Week 5! Thursday night, the two most underrated or surprising team imo. Should be a good one. Two sunday night games look to be awesome. Rough for Houston having to deal with two NFC West teams b2b Monday Night, who would have thought we would be seeing a 2-2 Jets vs 1-3 Falcons team. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Pookie | Oct 2 2013, 12:55 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Pookie Powa!
![]()
|
I think the Houston Texans will end up beating the 49ers because their game against the Seahawks was a close one. They could have easily won that game if it were not for some major mistakes. I see this as a game that Houson will want to redeem itself. I don't see them losing two in a row. As for the Falcons, they have the star power so I don't see the Jets having enough oomph to overtake them. They may be 2-2, but I see that as more-so playing weaker/beatable opponents. The Falcons lost to the Saints, but the Saints are miles better than the Jets at the moment. I picked the Giants to win because obviously they are my team, and it is a rival game where anything can happen. I don't have much confidence that they will beat the Eagles though mainly because their offense is in shambles. If it were just defenses, the Giants would win by miles. Either way, I will be hoping that the Giants can find some way to run the ball and Killdrive (lol) can be more intelligent with his play calling. Somehow, I doubt it. The Cleveland Browns are on a roll so I'm going with them. They beat the Vikings, who are no slouch, and they defeated Cincinnati who are also no slouch team. I see them bringing it to the Bills. Somehow, them losing their top running back has ignited a flame in their team. Edited by Pookie, Oct 2 2013, 04:44 PM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Master Gohan | Oct 2 2013, 12:57 PM Post #3 |
![]() ![]()
|
Confident for this week. I truly think the Giants will win this week. Best part is, the Cowboys play the Broncos (Most likely a loss) so if the Giants win, they would only be out 1 GAME if the Cowboys lose (most likely) 1-4 and 1 game back, crazy. Excited for the DEN vs. Dal game will be good. And whats the point of having the JETS on MNF? Looking for the best games then. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Pookie | Oct 2 2013, 04:43 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Pookie Powa!
![]()
|
Isn't it funny how the Giants are 0-4 and still have a chance to make the playoffs? I'm hoping Killdrive (LOL i laughed at that nickname) can be smart this week. However, I'm not feeling that confident because he probably won't run the ball with Wilson like he should be calling.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Hurry My Curry | Oct 2 2013, 10:20 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Master Troll
![]()
|
So Giants fans people, Da'rell Scott waived by Giants. This mean that Wilson is the unquestioned lead back? I mean, Brandon Jacobs can't get a ton of carries right? Edit - I don't think its fair to blame the Giants struggles completely on the playcalling. When they did give Wilson a good amount of carries against Dallas, he rewarded them with two fumbles. He doesn't have any confidence in his own abilities, and that's more dangerous than anything. also you gotta admit that Eli has made some horrible decisions himself resulting in interceptions. Edited by Hurry My Curry, Oct 2 2013, 10:29 PM.
|
| Miles for mod | |
![]() |
|
| Pookie | Oct 3 2013, 12:44 AM Post #6 |
![]()
Pookie Powa!
![]()
|
@Hurry- This was on WEEK 1. WEEK 1! Where he was playing in a dallas stadium with 80,000 plus people, and it was his FIRST START. Do you know how many times Tiki Barber fumbled in his career? Do you want to know? Even after Tiki Barber fumbled, we'd put him in on the next play and let him run in every game no matter what happened. You can't fault Wilson AFTER ONE GAME for fumbling when I've seen so many running backs do it who are EVEN more experienced than him. Tom Coughlin made him hold the ball, and he has learned the right way. He sat out and learned his lesson. Since the Dallas game, he hasn't fumbled. I watch every snap, every play, and every minute of every Giants game. Wilson has not fumbled the ball since the Dallas game. Whenever he gets the ball, 8/10 times he will have positive yardage, and he is the type of guy that if he gets an opening has the break way speed . We have never had a running back like that. Tiki Barber was a great back that could cut and weave, but he didn't have the breakaway speed that Wilson does today so I do blame it on Gilldrive. He doesn't stick to the run period. Eli Manning's bad decisions are based off the fact that he is put in terrible situations like coming from behind 30 points where he is forced to throw into triple coverage, he is being attacked from all sides because of our bad/injured/old O-line, and he has had some interceptions bounce off people's ankles. He has to throw it because we don't have a running game because Gillbride won't stick with it. Eli Manning is not Peyton Manning, but even Peyton Manning will stick with the run because it keeps the offense from being one dimensional which the Giants have become. Even against the Giants, the Broncos ran the ball and we didn't do it all. Gillbride will stop running the ball after one negative play. I haven't seen the Giants run it on 3rd and short in A LONNNNNNNNNG TIME which we used to do all the time. Edit: Jacobs will probably get goal line carries and short and 3rd carries like he did when Bradshaw was on the team, but I highly doubt this because Gillbride doesn't stick to the run . Edited by Pookie, Oct 3 2013, 12:54 AM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Master Gohan | Oct 3 2013, 01:00 AM Post #7 |
![]() ![]()
|
Calm down tiger. David Wilson is fine. He now knows how to hold on to the fumble. His OL isn't helping (yes, the OL is basically the success of the RB unless they are AP) Yes, it isn't all on playcalling (Eli makes very questionable decisions to throw, like his INT against the chiefs int triple coverage with the closest NYG player 10 yards away.) But yeah, 0-4 and still have a chance to make the playoffs? This division sucks. I used to think the division was the toughest. NOPE |
| |
![]() |
|
| Pookie | Oct 3 2013, 01:05 AM Post #8 |
![]()
Pookie Powa!
![]()
|
It used to be the toughest, but a lot has changed. This season anyway. Why do you think he has to throw those passes Gohan? He is throwing the entire game and our O-line can't give him enough time to throw the long bombs that Gillbride likes to call all the time. He also is playing from behind so he has to take risks. When was the last time you saw us do a short pass or a screen pass that was successful? Gillbride is basically a long, play type of guy. The play calls are stale, not flexible, and most of all he doesn't run the ball. The main reason Gillbrde's play calls aren't working is because we don't have a strong O-line to do it anymore. They have become old/injured and so he has to either evolve or change something with his play calls. I saw a couple of times in the Kansas City Chiefs game where David Wilson gained 8 yards on a run. Instead of running again, we tried two passing plays which usually ended up having us not convert the 3rd down. I even saw at one point it be 3rd and one. We used David Wilson to run it rather than Jacobs whose specialty is on those short type of plays. It is beyond me why he would call something like that. Edited by Pookie, Oct 3 2013, 01:07 AM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Master Gohan | Oct 3 2013, 01:32 AM Post #9 |
![]() ![]()
|
He doesn't need to throw them. I am questioning Eli's decision making. Like when he threw that INT in the Broncos game right before the half. That was the worst thing I have ever seen. Manning tends to make really dumb INT's and if he has no one open, just throw it away. INT's are killer and will destroy the Giants. I agree with the 3rd and one. I thought Jacobs was there for that, but they send Wilson. Jacobs could bowl through and get that yard. Edited by Master Gohan, Oct 3 2013, 01:32 AM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Pookie | Oct 3 2013, 02:19 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Pookie Powa!
![]()
|
He does have to throw them if they are behind by a ton of scores. The one where he tossed it into the end zone against the Broncos I specifically remember Gillbride giving up on the run before the half was over, yet Peyton Manning, who calls his own plays, kept with the run despite having negative plays with it. Eventually, it broke down the entire Giants defense and won them the game. The first interception against Dallas was his fault, but a lot of other ones weren't. When you are playing from behind with how behind the Giants have been in recent weeks, I blame it more so on the play calling with the lack of run that has been included. Eli Manning needs a run game. Eli Manning is already a proven quarter back, therefore, I am not concerned with him. It has been stated over several weeks, by O'Hara, that the Offensive line has been extremely weak which means Eli has to throw the ball sooner than he would like too. Since most of the Giants plays take longer to develop, it means that there are going to be more issues. There are rarely any quarterbacks who can play well in this league with a broken offensive line. Ohara:
article: http://nypost.com/2013/09/26/ohara-giants-o-line-didnt-adjust-to-panthers-beatdown/ Edited by Pookie, Oct 3 2013, 02:26 AM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Master Gohan | Oct 3 2013, 03:12 AM Post #11 |
![]() ![]()
|
The one vs. broncos giants were down 1-2 points easy FG. Very stupid. I understand needing to chuck it downfield, but at least put it near a recievver. I think they can do it this week, we will see. If they go 0-5 i just want them to get 0-16 for draft picks, may as well. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Pookie | Oct 3 2013, 03:36 AM Post #12 |
![]()
Pookie Powa!
![]()
|
I agree that some of the interceptions are Eli's fault like the one in the Broncos that you pointed out, but the others he threw are more-so on the play calling for the reasons listed above. The lack of running game is horrific. O'hara wouldn't point out the offensive line if it weren't true. If the Giants have a bad record, it would be for their benefit. |
| |
![]() |
|
| + Rebel X | Oct 3 2013, 03:59 AM Post #13 |
![]() ![]()
|
Giants Suck. The End. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Hurry My Curry | Oct 3 2013, 06:03 AM Post #14 |
![]()
Master Troll
![]()
|
He was benched in his rookie season for putting the ball on the ground, you can't do that as a running back. He comes in with his problems supposedly solved, and puts it on the ground again. Coughlin seems to think that he needed a place in his dog house. Plus comparing David Wilson to Tiki Barber, yikes. I don't disagree that Eli has been put in bad decisions, but a QB always has the option to checkdown or throw the ball away. I just find it odd that with Victor Cruz and Hakeem Nicks out there (and even Reuben Randle to a lesser extent) that the Giants can't run the ball. A team with two stud receivers should have wide open running lanes. Is the o line THAT bad? I mean the o line out in GB isn't great, but with Rodgers there, any competent running back (Lacy, Franklin, Starks) are all capable of putting up 100+. Bears have the same situation with Forte. BTW, question never got answered. Is David Wilson the unquestioned leadback out there now? For fantasy football purposes lol. He's on the waiver wire. Edited by Hurry My Curry, Oct 3 2013, 06:04 AM.
|
| Miles for mod | |
![]() |
|
| Master Gohan | Oct 3 2013, 01:03 PM Post #15 |
![]() ![]()
|
That season is over. He isn't getting benched, in fact if they stuck to the run, I think WIlson would do quite nicely. |
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · NFL · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:48 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy











Either way, I will be hoping that the Giants can find some way to run the ball and Killdrive (lol) can be more intelligent with his play calling. Somehow, I doubt it.




I'm hoping Killdrive (LOL i laughed at that nickname) can be smart this week. However, I'm not feeling that confident because he probably won't run the ball with Wilson like he should be calling.



4:48 PM Jul 13