Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Women sentenced to 20 years for firing warning shot at husband getting a retrial
Topic Started: Sep 26 2013, 11:37 PM (387 Views)
Return Of Imjustsaiyanbro
Member Avatar
Elder

Well, he allegedly attacked her and this lady got 20 years for firing a shot. Now she's getting a retrial. What do you think about this?
http://www.bet.com/news/national/2013/09/26/woman-sentenced-to-20-years-for-firing-warning-shot-gets-a-new-trial.html?cid=socialHardNews_20130926_12420674
STRAIGHT OUTTA NAMEK

I miss my cocoa butter kisses. Which one of these mods tryna let me bust?
Spoiler: click to toggle


Spoiler: click to toggle
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pookie
Member Avatar
Pookie Powa!

I think she rightfully deserves a retrial because 20 years is way too much, but one thing that I dislike about this article is the fact that they point to the "race" factor again. This is a BET article so I was fully expecting it.

They don't truly go into the details of the trial and what exactly the husband had said to her so I can't comment any further.

Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Master Gohan
Member Avatar


So murders get less than a warning shot now? Alright, makes sense.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Return Of Imjustsaiyanbro
Member Avatar
Elder

Pookie
Sep 27 2013, 02:10 AM
I think she rightfully deserves a retrial because 20 years is way too much, but one thing that I dislike about this article is the fact that they point to the "race" factor again. This is a BET article so I was fully expecting it.

They don't truly go into the details of the trial and what exactly the husband had said to her so I can't comment any further.

Tell em Pookie!

I think if he attacked her it was self defense and she didn't intend to shoot him.
STRAIGHT OUTTA NAMEK

I miss my cocoa butter kisses. Which one of these mods tryna let me bust?
Spoiler: click to toggle


Spoiler: click to toggle
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pookie
Member Avatar
Pookie Powa!

I'm not saying what she did was right, but if it was out of self defense, then I can see why she may have done it. They don't go enough into the details of the case for me to make a solid opinion on it.

However, I hate when they point out the race factor. It has nothing to do with race. This is how I feel anyway.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
0 users reading this topic
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Learn More · Register Now
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91