Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Classic Novels People Lie About Reading
Topic Started: Sep 14 2013, 06:02 PM (628 Views)
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

The top ten books people claim to have read, but haven't, are:

1984 by George Orwell – 26%
War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy – 19%
Great Expectations by Charles Dickens – 18%
Catcher in the Rye by J D Salinger – 15%
A Passage to India by E M Forster – 12%
Lord of the Rings by J R R Tolkein – 11%
To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee – 10%
Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky – 8%
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen – 8%
Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë – 5%

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10286930/More-than-half-of-us-lie-about-reading-classic-novels.html

Of those I have actually read: 1984, Catcher in the Rye, Lord of the Rings, To Kill a Mockingbird (it's awful) and a lot of Jane Eyre but never finished it. I've lied about reading War and Peace and Great Expectations though.
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mihawk
Member Avatar


My list is the same as yours except I tried to read the mockbird book but just couldn't.

Posted Image

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Buuberries
Member Avatar
No

lol yeah Idk why people do that. pseudointellectuals in general piss me off.

personally i avoid so-called classics because i find what they're about pretty dull-sounding.

1984 has been on my to-read list for the past 4 years, lol. will get around to it someday.
tried catcher in the rye many years ago but gave up after a few pages.
to kill a mockingbird... had to study it a few years ago for an english literature lesson, but i dropped it after they offered psychology because that was what i was after in the first place. took me 6 weeks just to get to page 50 because I found it that boring.
pride and prejudice, and jane eyre... i have no interest whatsoever in those. bought pride and prejudice for my sister as a gift cuz she likes to read more than i do, but that's probably the only time i'll ever touch that book.
lotr has also been on my list for ages but tolkien's writing is a bit more archaic than what im used to so i'm not sure how that will go down.

not going to lie: never heard of the others other than great expectations
Edited by Buuberries, Sep 14 2013, 06:17 PM.
¯\(°_o)/¯
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Goddess Ultimecia
Member Avatar


of that list I attempted to read War and Peace, only got to page 100 and I just quit.

We had to read "To Kill A Mockingbird" in my Freshman English class. I didn't really like it.
Posted Image

NinjaSushi Colouring
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


I hate classic literature, and I'm an English major. Life is rough.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
foot soldier
Member Avatar


To Kill a Mockingbird is required reading in most of the US. I liked it when I read it the second time on my own schedule.

Tolkien's work is hard to get into, but if you've got the time and the dedication to get past the beginning of the novel and into Bree with the wee hobbits, you're golden.

Great Expectations is just junk though, most boring thing I've ever read.

Most classic lit isn't meant to be enjoyed as story time, though. The majority of it is commentary, and when read in that light, they're a lot more interesting.
Posted Image

Playing Raditz's Game
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

I feel like I'm the only person I know who actually liked Catcher in the Rye.

Yeah they're good to study, which is why a lot of those are used in English classes, but I think a book should be entertaining first and foremost and if it fails at that then there's no real point in reading it.
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Master Gohan
Member Avatar


Copy_Ninja
Sep 15 2013, 04:07 AM
I feel like I'm the only person I know who actually liked Catcher in the Rye.

Yeah they're good to study, which is why a lot of those are used in English classes, but I think a book should be entertaining first and foremost and if it fails at that then there's no real point in reading it.
catcher was so awful, I cried while reading it.

explain that to English teachers nowadays. They try to shove books we clearly do not enjoy down our throats. Its funny that they don't realize that we all have different interests. I would say I don't enjoy reading, but it is definitely because of what school has done. All my life they have given me books that I have zero interest in, so why would I enjoy reading? I have enjoyed reading when I was reading what I liked. Which is the problem with schools. Just because some English teacher likes Catcher in the Rye, doesn't mean I will.

And then they wonder "why are kids nowadays not enjoying books as much?" hmm, idk, cause you're blind.
Edited by Master Gohan, Sep 15 2013, 04:21 AM.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doggo Champion 2k17
Default Avatar


I literally cried while reading The Great Gatsby for school because I just couldn't do it.

My brother loves The Catcher in the Rye.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Master Gohan
Member Avatar


My teacher kept saying it was relatable to people my age, but it really wasn't at all.

I feel like we were made to read it because some nutjub who murdered someone said he did it because of the book. That book did nothing to make him do it, because he was crazy and was bound to kill someone anyway.
Edited by Master Gohan, Sep 15 2013, 04:55 AM.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

It's kind of a strange book to like admittedly. The plot isn't terribly exciting, nothing major really happens. It's mostly just Holden complaining about things and meandering around the city for a while. I also get how it's hard to read because of the time difference from when it was written. But I don't know, I feel like Holden was good enough as a character to hold my interest on his own.
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
UncleGoten
Member Avatar


The only one on that list i have read is "To kill a Mockingbird".
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
« Previous Topic · Books & Comics · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91