Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Jesus vs Religon
Topic Started: Jan 13 2012, 01:55 PM (2,678 Views)
SirParagon
Member Avatar
Sparking!

Isn't this like loving an engine, but despising the car? Then convincing yourself that the engine has a point without a vehicle? Of course that is assuming the car is actually a car and not a mound of compost.

I enjoyed TJ's response (thanks for sharing Rouge), even though his points are obvious and basic, at least I can 100% agree... also he's pretty funny. Yet he really has to learn that arguing logic with the religious is utterly futile, even more-so with people who are religious without actually knowing what the hell they're talking about.
Edited by SirParagon, Jan 14 2012, 11:32 PM.
New Account: Spirit Metaphor

Voluntarism?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Sousen Ichimonji
Member Avatar
You are calm and reposed, let your beauty unfold

SirParagon
Jan 14 2012, 11:26 PM
Yet he really has to learn that arguing logic with the religious is utterly futile, even more-so with people who are religious without actually knowing what the hell they're talking about.
If atheism holds the vantage of logic then why do people need to devolve themselves to shouting and swearing at the theists who disagree with them?

I'm going to be clear, concise and brief with my opinion of people like The Amazing Atheist: people who are very sure that they are right but can't simply believe that and not bash other peoples opinions are intolerant, rude scum. Fascists. And no, that's not just in direction to atheists. Of course there are theists that are the same. But that doesn't justify an equally abhorrant response.
Posted Image

Call me a safe bet, I'm betting I'm not
I'm glad that you can forgive, only hoping as time goes, you can forget

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

You are aware that he shouts and such more for entertainment value rather than to get his points across? I'm not sure his videos are aimed towards theists anyway.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Seruphim
Member Avatar
Cell's Angel

Cal
Jan 14 2012, 03:14 PM
Rogue
Jan 14 2012, 03:11 PM
Cal
Jan 14 2012, 03:08 PM
That's true, but there is nothing wrong with defending what you believe or debating a topic. That's why I said usually.

Of course not but there are videos of religious commentators attacking Athiests to make them look stupid, it happens both ways.
I agree, I edited my post before you replied and said (in certain manners). The thing is religious groups have an excuse (to call people out, not make them look stupid), doesn't make them right, but they have one.
Atheists have an excuse to call out religious people as well. We've already agreed that both sides call each other out just to prove their superiority/make them look stupid, but that doesn't mean only religious people have a 'moral' excuse to call people out.
Atheists call religious people out when there's a gross misrepresentation of facts. Just because you believe the Earth is 6000 years old doesn't mean it actually is.
And religious morals are not all that good anyway. I'm speaking from a Christian standpoint because I don't know enough about the other religious to argue it well enough. And I also know that not every Christian reads the Bible thoroughly and knows that homosexuality is forbidden, God is a douche, slavery is promoted and that women should be quiet. Atheists also sometimes feel a need to call Christians out when they're touting their morals around like it's the end all to everything.
And also when atheists are told that we don't have morals. Oh yes, because you can only get them from religion.
So no, religious people are not the only ones with a valid excuse to call out others.

I think this was already touched on a bit by Rogue but it just seems like you think only religious people have a valid excuse to call others out.
Posted Image


Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SirParagon
Member Avatar
Sparking!

Indeed, TheAmazingAthiest is an entertainment channel, not one for serious philosophical discussion (although sometimes he gets Howard Bloom to talk for hours and he's pretty damn intelligent). Most of the time he just picks really easy and popular targets so that the atheists can point their fingers and laugh. Personally I can't say they are wrong for doing so, but it's definitely not the right way to go about a debate even if it is pointless.
Edited by SirParagon, Jan 15 2012, 12:15 AM.
New Account: Spirit Metaphor

Voluntarism?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cal
Member Avatar
I may not deserve to live, but I will protect those in my reach with my reverse blade!

Seruphim
Jan 15 2012, 12:11 AM
Cal
Jan 14 2012, 03:14 PM
Rogue
Jan 14 2012, 03:11 PM
Cal
Jan 14 2012, 03:08 PM
That's true, but there is nothing wrong with defending what you believe or debating a topic. That's why I said usually.

Of course not but there are videos of religious commentators attacking Athiests to make them look stupid, it happens both ways.
I agree, I edited my post before you replied and said (in certain manners). The thing is religious groups have an excuse (to call people out, not make them look stupid), doesn't make them right, but they have one.
Atheists have an excuse to call out religious people as well. We've already agreed that both sides call each other out just to prove their superiority/make them look stupid, but that doesn't mean only religious people have a 'moral' excuse to call people out.
Atheists call religious people out when there's a gross misrepresentation of facts. Just because you believe the Earth is 6000 years old doesn't mean it actually is.
And religious morals are not all that good anyway. I'm speaking from a Christian standpoint because I don't know enough about the other religious to argue it well enough. And I also know that not every Christian reads the Bible thoroughly and knows that homosexuality is forbidden, God is a douche, slavery is promoted and that women should be quiet. Atheists also sometimes feel a need to call Christians out when they're touting their morals around like it's the end all to everything.
And also when atheists are told that we don't have morals. Oh yes, because you can only get them from religion.
So no, religious people are not the only ones with a valid excuse to call out others.

I think this was already touched on a bit by Rogue but it just seems like you think only religious people have a valid excuse to call others out.
As I said in the same post you quoted:

Quote:
 
but there is nothing wrong with defending what you believe or debating a topic.



The only problem comes when you have to justify WHY you're doing what it is you're doing. What was the point of the original video? It was to spread a message whether right or not in a sound manner. What was the point of the video that follows? To BASH the original.

I wont defend that, no matter how much you dress it up. I don't mean (even if I did) to make this video sound like the voice of every atheist, just using it as an example as it was posted.
Edited by Cal, Jan 15 2012, 12:21 AM.


Posted Image

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SirParagon
Member Avatar
Sparking!

If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
Edited by SirParagon, Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM.
New Account: Spirit Metaphor

Voluntarism?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cal
Member Avatar
I may not deserve to live, but I will protect those in my reach with my reverse blade!

SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM
If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
So this is your justification? "Well i pretty much think because this guy wants to tell people how he feels he's an idiot, so I have the responsibility to bash him just because I don't buy it."

For every argument that's not concrete there is an equal and counter-argument against it. Unfortunately people would rather "yell louder" with "you're stupid" than use that counter argument.
Edited by Cal, Jan 15 2012, 12:26 AM.


Posted Image

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SirParagon
Member Avatar
Sparking!

Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:26 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM
If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
So this is your justification? "Well i pretty much think because this guy wants to tell people how he feels he's an idiot, so I have the responsibility to bash him just because I don't buy it."

For every argument that's not concrete there is an equal and counter-argument against it. Unfortunately people would rather "yell louder" than use that counter argument.
How would you react if someone kept insisting that 2 + 2 = 6, where is the equal counter argument? You don't seriously engage in a debate with someone who is a moron.
Edited by SirParagon, Jan 15 2012, 12:29 AM.
New Account: Spirit Metaphor

Voluntarism?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cal
Member Avatar
I may not deserve to live, but I will protect those in my reach with my reverse blade!

SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:27 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:26 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM
If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
So this is your justification? "Well i pretty much think because this guy wants to tell people how he feels he's an idiot, so I have the responsibility to bash him just because I don't buy it."

For every argument that's not concrete there is an equal and counter-argument against it. Unfortunately people would rather "yell louder" than use that counter argument.
How would you react if someone kept insisting that 2 + 2 = 6. Where is the equal counter argument?
I would prove myself correct by using mathematical common sense, not yell and say, "It's *****ing 4, how the ***** do you get 6? WTF are you trying to do?"

It's not even about proving yourself right, is being able to justify your answer or reaction.


Posted Image

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SirParagon
Member Avatar
Sparking!

Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:29 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:27 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:26 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM
If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
So this is your justification? "Well i pretty much think because this guy wants to tell people how he feels he's an idiot, so I have the responsibility to bash him just because I don't buy it."

For every argument that's not concrete there is an equal and counter-argument against it. Unfortunately people would rather "yell louder" than use that counter argument.
How would you react if someone kept insisting that 2 + 2 = 6. Where is the equal counter argument?
I would prove myself correct by using mathematical common sense, not yell and say, "It's *****ing 4, how the ***** do you get 6? WTF are you trying to do?"

It's not even about proving yourself right, is being able to justify your answer or reaction.
Who are you originally referring to? TJ? Granted he does get ridiculous at times, he rarely neglects to give his reason as to why.
New Account: Spirit Metaphor

Voluntarism?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cal
Member Avatar
I may not deserve to live, but I will protect those in my reach with my reverse blade!

SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:30 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:29 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:27 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:26 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM
If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
So this is your justification? "Well i pretty much think because this guy wants to tell people how he feels he's an idiot, so I have the responsibility to bash him just because I don't buy it."

For every argument that's not concrete there is an equal and counter-argument against it. Unfortunately people would rather "yell louder" than use that counter argument.
How would you react if someone kept insisting that 2 + 2 = 6. Where is the equal counter argument?
I would prove myself correct by using mathematical common sense, not yell and say, "It's *****ing 4, how the ***** do you get 6? WTF are you trying to do?"

It's not even about proving yourself right, is being able to justify your answer or reaction.
Who are you originally referring to? TJ? Granted he does get ridiculous at times, he rarely neglects to give his reason as to why.
I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm saying this video is a joke because it's more about making fun of religious people than proving any kind of points. You're correct, for every 5 inside bashing jokes and 10 expletives you can see a point.
Edited by Cal, Jan 15 2012, 12:36 AM.


Posted Image

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SirParagon
Member Avatar
Sparking!

Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:33 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:30 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:29 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:27 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:26 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM
If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
So this is your justification? "Well i pretty much think because this guy wants to tell people how he feels he's an idiot, so I have the responsibility to bash him just because I don't buy it."

For every argument that's not concrete there is an equal and counter-argument against it. Unfortunately people would rather "yell louder" than use that counter argument.
How would you react if someone kept insisting that 2 + 2 = 6. Where is the equal counter argument?
I would prove myself correct by using mathematical common sense, not yell and say, "It's *****ing 4, how the ***** do you get 6? WTF are you trying to do?"

It's not even about proving yourself right, is being able to justify your answer or reaction.
Who are you originally referring to? TJ? Granted he does get ridiculous at times, he rarely neglects to give his reason as to why.
I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm saying his channel is a joke because it's more about making fun of religious people than proving any kind of points. You're correct, for every 5 inside bashing jokes and 10 expletives you can see a point.
...but that's the whole point :p

Of course it isn't a suitable counter-argument to lash out at idiot perspectives, but that doesn't mean TJ isn't openly appealing to what many atheists think anyway - which is part of the reason he is so popular.
New Account: Spirit Metaphor

Voluntarism?
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cal
Member Avatar
I may not deserve to live, but I will protect those in my reach with my reverse blade!

SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:36 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:33 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:30 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:29 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:27 AM
Cal
Jan 15 2012, 12:26 AM
SirParagon
Jan 15 2012, 12:23 AM
If one side of the argument lacks a consistent logic and/or presents itself as ignorant then there isn't much you can do besides ignore them or bash the flaws hoping that they will shape up or shut up.
So this is your justification? "Well i pretty much think because this guy wants to tell people how he feels he's an idiot, so I have the responsibility to bash him just because I don't buy it."

For every argument that's not concrete there is an equal and counter-argument against it. Unfortunately people would rather "yell louder" than use that counter argument.
How would you react if someone kept insisting that 2 + 2 = 6. Where is the equal counter argument?
I would prove myself correct by using mathematical common sense, not yell and say, "It's *****ing 4, how the ***** do you get 6? WTF are you trying to do?"

It's not even about proving yourself right, is being able to justify your answer or reaction.
Who are you originally referring to? TJ? Granted he does get ridiculous at times, he rarely neglects to give his reason as to why.
I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm saying his channel is a joke because it's more about making fun of religious people than proving any kind of points. You're correct, for every 5 inside bashing jokes and 10 expletives you can see a point.
...but that's the whole point :p

Of course it isn't a suitable counter-argument to lash out at idiot perspectives, but that doesn't mean TJ isn't openly appealing to what many atheists think anyway - which is part of the reason he is so popular.
I'm not trying to take anything away from the entertainment value, just when you have people like The Sixth Doctor on page one who goes from I can believe in Mythology Gods to The Amazing Atheist is always right...

Anyway I think we're arguing two different points lol.


Posted Image

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kruegs Outlandish
Default Avatar


TheAmazingAtheist isn't Atheist. SARCASM IS HIS GOD... and without it, he'd be forsook, I'm afraid... and he ignores the context completely.

The "Jesus isn't Republican" line emphasizes that Jesus is often referred to by Republican candidates to get votes from Evangelicals... Herman Cain, Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry, etc...

But, in all honesty, he's a YouTube personality; in that respect, he is over-the-top as to get views, etc. Either that, or YouTube lets people trolol worldwide... but ranting about a popular video, for the most, puts me off. View-mongering and trolol, all the way around! Get that man a drink!
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91