Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
What about trunks?!; saiyan question...
Topic Started: Jul 12 2010, 06:03 PM (404 Views)
burntfish44
Default Avatar


So, as we all know... trunks is the offspring of Vegeta and Bulma... a saiyan and a human...
And Gohan/goten are the offsprings of a saiyan and human as well.

Why is it that Gohan has a tail but Trunks does not? if i recall correctly... you never see trunks with a tail at all?? And goten either... he has the exact same blood mix as gohan.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gigacrusher
Member Avatar


I think it's the same reason Trunks and Goten could turn into Super Sayians so easily. By that point it might of been something that was out of Goku and Vegeta's body chemistry. Goku had Gohan when he had a tail.

OR they just immediately removed the tails when they were born because they knew about the trouble it would cause.
Dragon Ball Z Saga Trailer : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhUkxNkALm8

I've adapted the DBZ anime by editing the anime seasons down into feature films.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Ryebrid
Member Avatar


Well nothings ever been said about their tails so i geuss anything can be said about them.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bouncefox
Member Avatar
"What's this? More wolves hungry for the blood of Almire?"

My guess is that they probably had their tails, but were chopped off, since there was no way they were going to master the Oozaru form like Vegeta did. But it's just a guess. Giga was on the mark. It's what I always thought what happened.
Try this, you might like it.

Posted Image


Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jor darth
Default Avatar


because he didnt turn great ape in between the age 2-7, but he should have. but then again he probably has more human blood then saiyan
Hey..... add me as your friend if you want. but sometimes im hyper, i warned you! uhuh ill be back from singapore in a week, but ill keep on posting!

EDIT: im back from singapore.
EDIT 2: who knows a good resturuant?
EDIT 3: im saying edit because its ownage, and dont you forget it!
EDIT 4:you can forget if you want.........
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Super Goku
Member Avatar
Vizard Jinchurikii

I think someone mentioned something about baby trunks' tail right when he's first introduced, at the end of vol. 12 I believe. I think the only thing that was said was by kurirun, and he said something like "so, did you cut off his tail then?" or something. and bulma didnt answer.
But I think bulma would DEFINITELY cut off the tail, as she saw Goku transform multiple times. If Vegeta was a bigger part of trunks' life as a baby, he probably wouldve had a say in it. But he wasnt, so it was all bulmas decision and its assumed that she would cut off the tail that trunks probably had. thats all im sayin.
Posted Image
BURNING HELL FTW
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DaLucster72
Member Avatar


I'm pretty sure it's implied that it gets cut off, but I'm not exactly sure.
Posted Image
Made by the almighty lilason
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
0 users reading this topic
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
« Previous Topic · Dragon Ball/Z Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91