Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Euro 2008 Discussions and Predictions
Topic Started: Jun 3 2008, 06:34 AM (1,641 Views)
.Punxx
Member Avatar
Worst Member of the Year

Quote:
 
Well a game of 0-0 tells me nither team managed to searve the aim of the game which is to kick the football into the back of a net attached to a frame and failing to do that tells me they did bad.

you don't watch to much soccer do you? As you already know the aim of the game is to get the ball in the back of the net. What you didn't mention are the defensive specialists of the game. The goal keeper as well. You can be having the best game in the world and yet have the score being 0-0 because both teams were firing @ the net, yet both teams were playing strong defensivley, as both teams wanted to win and neither wants to loose. In fact Italy is a defensive specialist team, in hockey New Jersey is a defensive specialist team.. the aim of hockey is to get the puck in the back of the net, yet New Jersey doesn't get many pucks behind the net because they take a defensive aim, and they been a great team doing that.

Quote:
 
That's like going into a war and saying nither side killed anyone but they wounded a few people. I mean, they didn't do their job did they.

no it's not, a sport is a game.. war isn't.

you can't just say "nobody scored so they were playing bad" I could much easily say.. "the score was 0-0 they were playing incredible, and both defensive sides were extremley suberb" guess you just have to watch the entire game though, you can't just look at the scoreboard.. the score can be 10-10 and both teams were playing *****.
Edited by .Punxx, Jun 24 2008, 07:24 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

But the aim is to get past the defence, it's no good saying "Oh both teams where great defensivly" I mean what's the point being all defensive in a game you are suppost to attack and score in? Silly, I belive that if a game ends in 0-0, both teams wasted their time, who cares if they played well defensivly and the keeper made a great save, the point is to score, if you don't score, you are missing the point of the game and if you miss the point of the game you are still a loser.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pookie
Member Avatar
Pookie Powa!

Punxx is exactly right. The score does not ALWAYS reflect a team's performance as I told punxx several days before. He said that Russia would lose to Holland because they were defeated by Spain 4-1. Conversely, I watched the game, and I disagreed with him. I told him that Russia played well despite their inability to finish their opportunities, which is why I chose them to be the favorites against Holland. Guess what? They defeated Holland.

Spain had a great game. I would not have been disappointed with their determination if they had lost. The players left their hearts on the field. They had their opportunities, but were unable to put it behind the net. In the end, penalty kicks were the deciding factor.
Edited by Pookie, Jun 24 2008, 07:32 PM.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

Like I said, I find watching any game boring, from my point of view 0-0 means they both sucked, I don't like the look of a 0-0 scoreline, it's very boring.

Argue as much as you will that so and so almost score and Blah FC where the better side on the feild, they could have score if ... and so forth, I honestly don't give a rats arse about any of that.

I like numbers.

0 is a boring number.

Ergo that is my view.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pookie
Member Avatar
Pookie Powa!

You are entitled to your opinion as anyone is, but at the same time it's unfair to assume that a team played poorly because of a score.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

Well you could have someone who watched the whole game and said it was a bad game, you know. But yeah, the score means a lot to me, it shows that nither team managed to score which is the key point to the game :x
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
.Punxx
Member Avatar
Worst Member of the Year

Quote:
 
But the aim is to get past the defence, it's no good saying "Oh both teams where great defensivly" I mean what's the point being all defensive in a game you are suppost to attack and score in?

DUH so the other team doesn't score on you, and you have less of a chance to loosing the game. Who's to say it's an ALL defensive game? Defensive specialist, yes. ALL defensive, no. The point of a defensive specialist is to keep out the the opposing offense at all times then counter, build a firm lead, and keep that lead. Conservative play if you will. @ times it will work, @ times it won't. Obviously so, you can't win them all.. as the lifelong saying goes. and i like the way you say "the aim is to get past the defense" so.. if a team has extraordinary defense, and not many opposing teams can get past an extraordinary defense.. would you say "oh.. well.. the aim of the game was to get past their defense and they didn't" yet you neglected a great defensive.

Quote:
 
Silly, I belive that if a game ends in 0-0, both teams wasted their time, who cares if they played well defensivly and the keeper made a great save, the point is to score, if you don't score, you are missing the point of the game and if you miss the point of the game you are still a loser.

How did they waste their time? I for one, during the penalty kicks of the Spain-Italy game was thinking "thanks heavens for our defensive squad.. had it not been for them I'd have wasted my time watching Italy get destroyed by Spain" You seem to overlook a small aspect of the game though. Time badly wasted would be a low quality game.. so despite the score, it's the quality of the score that counts. Not the quanitity. As I've mentioned the Italy-Spain game had great quality being played.

And that my friends is how defensive defensemen in soccer (and hockey) are usually overlooked.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

League wise, a 0-0 score does nothing, no goal diffrence added and only one point, so all in all, a waste of time. This tournement has penalties which settled the game yes but I still think 0-0 is a waste.

My view okay.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
.Punxx
Member Avatar
Worst Member of the Year

Quote:
 
League wise, a 0-0 score does nothing, no goal diffrence added and only one point, so all in all, a waste of time.

It could make a difference in the standings

1)Juventus 29
2) AC Milan 29
-------
4) Lazio 21
19) Parma 5

Juventus 1 - Parma 2
AC Milan 0 - Lazio 0

day 2
AC Milan 30
Juventus 29
----------
Lazio 22..
etc.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

However.

Day 1
1) Juventus 29
2) AC Milan 29
-------
4) Lazio 21
19) Parma 5

Juventus 1 - Parma 1
AC Milan 0 - Lazio 0

Day 2
1) Juventus 30
2) AC Milan 30
----------
4) Lazio 22
19) Parma 6

Zing
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
.Punxx
Member Avatar
Worst Member of the Year

Fact of the matter being:
(different) circumstance

of course a win is better than a draw.. but that's aside the point.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

I've stated my opinion already and I'm not going to change it no matter how much football terminology you throw at me.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Light
Member Avatar
Yo

i agree with punxx and angelichottieds, but yeah it's all opinions so it doesn't really matter
but i wouldn't say wanting a different team to win means your not a true sports fan
i want spain to win because my dream team has 4 spanish players, and i want russia to win because they have a good squad and are the underdogs (turkey are just bleh lol)
this is because i can never support wales because they never qualify lol
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
.Punxx
Member Avatar
Worst Member of the Year

Quote:
 
this is because i can never support wales because they never qualify lol

I used to do that for baseball.. at 1 point when i used to follow it. As you know Montreal doesn't have a team.. and even when they did it ALWAYS SUCKED. So I've been a fan of the red sox ever since. whether they had a great season or missed the playoffs.. well, not anymore since I don't follow it..

off topic.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Light
Member Avatar
Yo

yeah lol, anyways

predictions for the next two games?
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Sports · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91