| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Americans hope to host the World Cup soon.. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 24 2008, 03:24 PM (469 Views) | |
|
|
May 24 2008, 03:24 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Worst Member of the Year
![]()
|
http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/spor...18worldcup.html
This is a joke, they just hosted their World Cup in 1994, Germany had to wait 30 years between World Cup hosting, Italy a good 50 years.. Brazil only hosted the event once in their long history at the highest stage. In al fairness of the game, the U.S got a shot at promoting this game, now it should be Canada's turn in 2018, if anything over the South American border. |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | May 28 2008, 02:31 PM Post #2 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
Oh well, I don't think the time matters, the US might get it as well. Does it really matter where it's hosted? People still kick a ball around and score goals. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
May 29 2008, 03:04 AM Post #3 |
![]()
Worst Member of the Year
![]()
|
In all fairness time does matter. Especially in international sporting events. The U.S.A should wait in line with other countries hoping to host a tournament. So to answer your question, yes it does matter in all fairness of the game, because that is what international competition should be advertising, fair play. |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | May 29 2008, 02:17 PM Post #4 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
Is there even a time limit to wait? lol? |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
May 29 2008, 04:24 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Worst Member of the Year
![]()
|
In all fairness of the game yes, although the asterisk which i think gains the US to hold their 2nd World Cup in 24 years, which is not as long as World Cup standards is the money they have to hold the event, or even the resources. Canada has all that, as well as the fans. We have a 60, 000 seater here in Montreal, and the thing is we can fill it up. We have a good 9 of those across Canada already. but this is above the the point ^ |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | May 29 2008, 04:27 PM Post #6 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
England has bigger stadiums than 60,000 seaters lol. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
May 29 2008, 05:05 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Worst Member of the Year
![]()
|
Well I dont think that matters.. lol 60, 000 more/less is a big number eitherway. If you can fill up that much for a sporting event it is a succes, that the size of most American Football and even Major League Baseball parks.. more or less |
![]() |
|
| Pookie | May 29 2008, 05:19 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Pookie Powa!
![]()
|
It would be cool to have the world cup in United States because I could watch Spain play, however, it will likely not happen. |
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| « Previous Topic · Sports · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:38 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy
















4:38 PM Jul 13