Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Do you think 9/11 was a strategic move?
Topic Started: Nov 5 2007, 01:59 PM (1,426 Views)
* Light
Member Avatar
Yo

I heard about that one after Charlie Sheen spoke up about it, plus i've been googling it a bit, mainly the point you made about the way they collapsed and there is a lot of evidence pointing to the fact it wouldn't have collapsed like that. Even if Bush wasn't behind it, i'm sure he definitely knew about it and could have done a lot more to stop it
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pookie
Member Avatar
Pookie Powa!

If all this is true, then how do you explain the WTC bomb situation in 1992 when President Clinton was president? :o_O: There was a documentary on the WTC and New York; most buildings in New York City are designed to fall straight down instead to the side. This is done to avoid a huge catostrofe from a skyscraper falling.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Light
Member Avatar
Yo

Stephen E Jones, a physicist at Brigham University argues that "Gravity driven collapse" without demonition charges would defy the laws of physics. I'm not saying your wrong, the buildings are probably designed like that but The way the towers fell, as Stephen E Jones said would defy the laws of physics

another thing is the highjackers identities, at first the fbi claimed that Waleed al-Shehri was one of the highjackers, but later they said they had found him in Casablanca, Morocco.All of the following were named as highjackers, Abdulaziz Al Omari, Saeed Alghamdi, and Khalid al-Midhar, three other hijackers, were all said to be living in the Middle East. After supposedly "crashing there planes"
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MajinShenron
Member Avatar
Got Demoted

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

The link above pretty matter deals with good arguments of why it's just not possible (with scientific links to the bottom describing how it fell).

But what I don't understand is how people can consider Bush such an idiot, yet he can formulate such a plan and be successful with it?
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* .Revolution
Default Avatar
.: Changing Everything :.

Bush is just a puppet, I think there are many people standing above him. Making him an idiot just covers the real deal. If you think he's dumb, you'd automtically think he can't pull out such a massacre just to serve the elite.
Posted Image


Bow down
Surrender unto me
Submit infectiously
Sanctify your demons

Click to visit my DeviatART

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MajinShenron
Member Avatar
Got Demoted

So killing thousands of people in such a barbaric manner would consider him an "elite." He had nothing to prove, he was just elected the president of the United States. You are making erroneous assumptions because you obviously don't like him.

I think it's sad that you would so deliberately accuse the president of the United States to attack itself to get respect from other people despite the fact he is higher up then them.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* .Revolution
Default Avatar
.: Changing Everything :.

In fact, I do not like him. But that isn't the reason I blame him for doing such a thing. It's just that all the facts are saying that he knew of 9/11 before it happened, as I said before.

It WAS NOT ment to get more respect for him, as he already naturally has that because of him being the President. It all serves to justify the rising regime of the new world order. It is ridicolous to think that terrorists who attacked the USA once were not able to do it again since then, the security has not increased that much. One strike was all that was needed to justify what the USA are doing right now.
Posted Image


Bow down
Surrender unto me
Submit infectiously
Sanctify your demons

Click to visit my DeviatART

Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MajinShenron
Member Avatar
Got Demoted

.Revolution
Dec 12 2007, 01:48 PM
In fact, I do not like him. But that isn't the reason I blame him for doing such a thing. It's just that all the facts are saying that he knew of 9/11 before it happened, as I said before.

It WAS NOT ment to get more respect for him, as he already naturally has that because of him being the President. It all serves to justify the rising regime of the new world order. It is ridicolous to think that terrorists who attacked the USA once were not able to do it again since then, the security has not increased that much. One strike was all that was needed to justify what the USA are doing right now.

You honestly believe there are no terrorist groups that want us bombed? You don't think invading two countries angers terrorist organizations which fill the Middle East? Of course not. If they have a terrorist attack here, they will obviously want to make it worse than 9/11. If they don't it already shows they have lost. Have they tried? Yes actually. There have been numerous attempts since then to have terrorist attacks. And even before 9/11 there have been terrorist attacks, throughout African embassies, the twin tower bombing ('91) and more.

And your first point makes no sense. He knew about it so he did it. So he knew he was going to pull of an attack so he obviously did it? No, that makes no sense. Yes, like often there was some intelligence saying there might be an attack somewhere. The government probably considered it an idle threat being as there hasn't been an attack at home in ten years, which by the way didn't kill many. Or blatant ignorance, either or.

And you make no sense. "The rising regime of the new world." You sound like George W Bush had ambitions since he was elected to become dictator of America.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Kogu 87
Member Avatar
Training hard !!

Yeah.

Let's just say that there is more to 9/11 than meets the eye.
-Training is bliss-

-The Stamina Sessions-
If challenge had a taste, you'd be quite delicious



Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
.Punxx
Member Avatar
Worst Member of the Year

i got confused reading this whole thread, one guy says one thing another guy says its a myth, u shuld delete it b4 people get even more confused
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MajinShenron
Member Avatar
Got Demoted

.Punxx
Dec 13 2007, 06:49 PM
i got confused reading this whole thread, one guy says one thing another guy says its a myth, u shuld delete it b4 people get even more confused

Two people with opposing views makes a thread confusing? It's called a debate, what this part of the forum was made.

Jesus Christ, I don't know how I deal with this.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
.Punxx
Member Avatar
Worst Member of the Year

MajinShenron
Dec 22 2007, 08:17 PM
.Punxx
Dec 13 2007, 06:49 PM
i got confused reading this whole thread, one guy says one thing another guy says its a myth, u shuld delete it b4 people get even more confused

Two people with opposing views makes a thread confusing? It's called a debate, what this part of the forum was made.

Jesus Christ, I don't know how I deal with this.

this was more than TWO people and 2nd of all u people sound like idiots, 1st of all this topic was made by an idiot. If any american rlly thinks 9/11 was a strategic move go say it in ur streets, or even better, go say it in the streets of NY's Little Italy, ur gona get ur teeth punched out. (then again im not suprised this topic wasnt started by an american)

Quote:
 
Jesus Christ, I don't know how I deal with this.

if this gets u THAT nervous to a point where u dont no how to deal wit it then id like to c how u deal wit real problems HAHA fkn loser
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Damaged
Member Avatar


i'm going to agree with what Kogu said,

// Try to say WHY YOU AGREE
// BBQ
- I don't know how to paint black skies blue.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ShamanPrincess
Member Avatar


I don't understand the mentallity of this thread.

Why would the US government, the President, and anyone else of higher ranks, want to kill thousands of people from thier OWN country, just to attack Iraq?

If they did, wouldn't they feel remorse for the thousands of people who loss there lives or lost families in the tragedy?

In my opinion the whole 'America did it themselves' theory is disgusting, and a load of rubbish.
I'm off to shoot Cloverfield with bottle rockets ^_^

Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Light
Member Avatar
Yo

why not? it's been done before, hitler (Reichstagsbrand) killed his own people so he had to a reason to persecute jews, Bush could use the same tactic with iraq, as revolution said
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
0 users reading this topic
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2

Theme Designed by McKee91