| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Is Wikipedia a Reliable Information Source? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 3 2007, 07:10 AM (1,929 Views) | |
| Silver Raditz | Mar 6 2007, 02:01 AM Post #16 |
|
A True Saiyan Warrior
![]()
|
If you're looking for some base place to start, it's fantastic. But as for perfect info...not so much. |
|
My Fan fic "He may be a regect but he's still my brother!"-Raditz | |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | Mar 6 2007, 08:37 AM Post #17 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
No site has perfect info, that's the whole reason for sourcing. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| EightyThor | Mar 6 2007, 11:22 PM Post #18 |
![]()
formerly ju5t_bl4z3
![]()
|
Wkikpedia is reat, the info you can get is quite accurate, very reliable source for info. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Refresh | Mar 7 2007, 03:22 AM Post #19 |
|
SrlY
![]()
|
oviously no site has perfect info but i dont find wikipedia to have as much relaible info since i have searched there and then differnet info on something else, |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | Mar 7 2007, 09:41 AM Post #20 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound Seems accurate to me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex Yeah, I'd say so, though it doesn't cite sources. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_forum I think we can pritty much agree for most of the information there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen Feel free to say that isn't pritty accurtate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion And again, looks pritty accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ea_games Not so accurate as it is marked with "The neutrality of this article is disputed." but I'm sure information from it is still decent. ----- Notice how I picked a selection of articles, all at random. Most had reliable information on them and when there is a problem, the article is tagged as such. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| yellowhairedguy20 | Mar 7 2007, 09:22 PM Post #21 |
|
Ribbit
![]()
|
It seems to me that everything on Wikipedia is pretty acurate. I don't believe I have come across anything that I know for a fact that it is not true. However, it couldn't hurt if you used Google instead... |
![]() |
|
| EightyThor | Mar 8 2007, 03:57 AM Post #22 |
![]()
formerly ju5t_bl4z3
![]()
|
but why bother using Google when Wikipedia is better? lol it's like saying i have a Cannon but i'mma stick with my Sling shot ![]() ~ majority of search engines are wack anyone, omg especially that dude.. the butler thingy... JEEVES [Ask Jeeves] omg i hate that guy ("Jeeves why are you so lame?")
|
| |
![]() |
|
| rem11 | Mar 8 2007, 04:02 AM Post #23 |
![]() ![]()
|
Jeeves: "cause you touch yourself at night" but yeah wikipedia ispretty reliable but not for huge projects that could cost you half your grade XD for that go with the most reliable yet homosexual of all a library |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Mirai Trunks SSJ | Mar 8 2007, 02:05 PM Post #24 |
![]()
Future Trunks
![]()
|
Wiki is not a good source. It shows only half or not enough of the information. |
![]() Hey all you anime fans. Come checkout the first Dragonball forum for Zeta called Dragonball Dragonball Evolution We have full episodes, RPG, clanning, DBZ chat topics, graphics and more. Come be apart of this soon to be great hit. Just click the sig above to visit!!!! | |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | Mar 8 2007, 03:26 PM Post #25 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
|
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| SSJ3_Iain | Mar 8 2007, 03:39 PM Post #26 |
![]()
|
http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-12-05-n22.html This is exactly why using wikipedia is a risk......because there are 1000's of pathetic wierdos out there trying to vandalise and alter pages. Ive seen acts of vandalism on wikipedia that have been there for months..... Agreed, most of it is accurate......but there is ALWAYS a risk. |
![]() ---=Gift 1=------=Gift 2=------=Gift 3=--- | |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | Mar 8 2007, 04:35 PM Post #27 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
Then umm, like check the history of the article, compare the current version to a previous one and if it has been vandalised, report it or revert it. I have reverted vandalised articles before. Also, they put the protection there to stop people doing it again, which is a good mesure. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Mirai Trunks SSJ | Mar 9 2007, 02:52 AM Post #28 |
![]()
Future Trunks
![]()
|
Protection isn't enough for the most determined crimanal. you know that as a fact. |
![]() Hey all you anime fans. Come checkout the first Dragonball forum for Zeta called Dragonball Dragonball Evolution We have full episodes, RPG, clanning, DBZ chat topics, graphics and more. Come be apart of this soon to be great hit. Just click the sig above to visit!!!! | |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | Mar 9 2007, 07:56 AM Post #29 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
Ummm, if it's protected, you can't edit the page, there's no way around that without getting into an account of somone who can... And I would hardly call a vandal a "determined crimanal"... |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| SSJ3_Iain | Mar 9 2007, 02:04 PM Post #30 |
![]()
|
BBQ....lol i totally get and understand what you're saying.... But by deffinition.....even with all the measures you have listed....wikipedia cannot be regarded as a 100% accurate information source. And at Degree level......that 0.5% degree of uncertainty isnt worth it. |
![]() ---=Gift 1=------=Gift 2=------=Gift 3=--- | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:53 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy















("Jeeves why are you so lame?")






4:53 PM Jul 13