Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Locked Topic
Versus Topic Rules
Topic Started: Nov 18 2006, 08:07 PM (9,863 Views)
Sam
Member Avatar
It takes a mere second for treasure to turn to trash.

(Just a note, take the basic principles from this post, I was ten years younger when I posted this, making me 12 years old at the time).

I've noticed in this section a lot of people doing a few things below...

Example A:

[A User Avoids all other posts which completely make the subject null and void because of evidence proved then POSTS something completely wrong and/or off topic/and/or ignorant.]

How to solve it: Read other posts before you make a judgment. I've even dealt with people who hop in there with horrible explanations then go oops sorry and stuff when I tell them to look at other posts it's extremely stupid.

Punishment: A verbal warn, repeated offenses may result in warns.

Example B:

[A user enters the topic, may or may not have done Example A then goes like this]

um... i think cuz he's cool [and/or] and becuz people above said so

How to solve it: How about you just don't post in the topic if it's obvious it's been solved. IF it clearly has been solved HOWEVER some stubborn person or someone who just wants to prove their point is in there arguing with other people about the subject at hand, feel free to post but don't go "um... cuz what other people said :D." then possibly repeat that as pages or posts go by. It is extremely annoying and makes you look retarded. This rule also comes into effect if you go into a topic and say "yeah, Goku'd win" and that's it. At least put your own input, you may go "Well, they already said it all!" but, it's easy to go "yeah I know in movie blah Goku fought him and got that power up bonus and with a senzu he would be able to win... blah blah" make it somewhat extensive, if you can't even do that then don't post at all.

Punishment: Verbal warn(s?) then official warns.

Example C:

[A user enters topic, may or may not have done Examples A/B then...]

"hi people i m hre! lolz. i thnk he would losee bcuz he has les pl then teh othar guy lol wuldnt it b funy if..."

How to solve it: Go to school, attend English class and learn grammar. This is just horrible. At least use SOME grammar so readers don't have to deduct your post, don't be retarded, don't abuse your keyboard. The shift/caps lock keys are your friend as well as spelling and grammar, and don't go off topic and start wondering about things in stupidity, I have a member here who does this but I won't name him. He's inactive a bit though.

Punishment: Verbal warns then just a warn, this is the most annoying.

Example D:

[A user enters/entered the topic and is angry at other members due to their beliefs then...]

ROFL. you stupid dumbass! your so wrong watch dbz dumb ***** then come back to the forum hahah n000b.

How to solve it: Trust me, I've seen this. Especially from a user called Broly God of Destruction. You may not change if you're reading this and doing this but read your punishment.

Punishment: Flaming is against the rules and enforced in this section, an official warn the first time, post suspension the second, plain suspension the third and a request to be banned from this section or if to an extreme, from the forum.


If the first 3 offenses are used then there will be no verbal warn but an official warn, repeated offenses may result in suspensions, bannings from this section however that is very unlikely. Example C is all too common, we aren't asking you to be a grammar fanatic, if you look at my posts I use all grammar I try. There are only a few members like this, at least make it like this...

"yeah i agree but it's not like goku could win the fight if he was only in ssj"

Okay, there was a lot of ways to brutalize that sentence and many ways for it to be acceptable for instance...

"yah i agre but its nt lik goku culd win teh figt if he ws olny in ssj."

I have seen that where they could've easily not screwed it up. The first one lacks much grammar but it is very easily readable.

If all 4 are done it will be a suspension then ban from section/forum but thats unlikely.

MANY members can meet these standards but those of you who don't correct yourselves.

Left open for staff suggestions/edits to the script to add to it and for members to post their comments.

Amendment A:

Any of you who constantly use a "Blow up the planet" or "Absorption" excuse for Kid Buu, Broly, Cell etc. will receive a warning if continuously mentioned, once is enough, it doesn't even make since to differ the entire battle on that.

Amendment B:

Make versus topics sensible, for instance.

Kid Buu vs Frieza 100% or Recoome vs GT Vegeta or Kid Buu vs Omega Shenron etc. doing such will get your topic closed, repeated offenses will result in verbal warns/warns.

Punishment for not limiting to three will be a verbal warn so...

1st offence: Verbal warn
2nd offence: 2nd Verbal warn
3rd offence: Warn

Then repeat.


Amendment D:

Double topics can be made as long as the original topic isn't on the first or second page. That way everything stays nice and neat, but posts keep happening.

Amendment E: I'm sick of seeing the DBZ Illiterate using DBZ Game moves in a versus. Broly does NOT have any moves. Gogeta doesn't have a "stardust breaker" they're all just made up names for regular attacks they do. Please keep moves that are used in DBZ Versus' out of the forums, they aren't applicable in a fight. DBZ Games are even worse than non-canon to base off of. Doing so repetitively will merit a warn.

Clarification to Amendment A:

In amendment A, it is stated that saying "well, Chibi Boo can just absorb SSj3 Goku and win!" is against the rules, as one could say "well, Chibi Boo could just absorb Omega Shenron!" as well to win any versus match. However, this can apply to most characters with the ability to blow up a planet. The following techniques are banned from versus battles because they are "hax" and will make the user of the technique win the versus battle no matter what:

Dabra's Stone Spit - This one's obvious. If you can spit on someone and kill them, you can basically win any fight.

Boo's Absorption - This one's obvious.

Cell's Absorption - This one's obvious.

Boo's Candy Ray - Obviously turning anyone into a bar of chocolate is sort of hax.

Gogeta's "Stardust Breaker" - it's disputable, but, some claim it can be used to disintegrate any evil character, which is obviously hax. This is the technique Gogeta used to kill Janemba with in movie 12/Fusion Reborn.

Piccolo's Makankosappo/Special Beam Cannon - it's not uber hax, but, could easily kill an opponent many times more powerful than him. And the 5-minute charge up time on this also makes it incredibly impractical as Piccolo could never use it one-on-one. Just leave it out of his arsenal.

The infamous "well, character X could just blow up the planet and so character Y would die!" - this is hax as well and banned. Since, for instance, Freeza could just death ball the planet and thus cause Broly to die of asphyxiation. Despite the fact that Broly is almost infinitely more powerful than Freeza, Freeza still wins simply because he can breathe in space and, Broly as a Saiyan, cannot.

Android #16/#17/#18's bomb - Though #17 and #18 had the bombs removed, they did have them at one point. I have seen a few versus' topics over the years where people thought they were clever to try to end a "Android #16 vs. Imperfect Cell (humans absorbed)" topic by having #16 blow himself up and kill Cell.

The Genki Dama/Spirit Bomb - The genki dama takes awhile to charge up and the only way Goku has done it successfully in the series is when he had plenty of time/allies. He was able to make one in the Saiyan Saga fight against Vegeta alone, but, even then, he failed and lost most of the energy and made Kuririn actually use the attack.

An infinite army of Meta Cooler's - This one is obvious.

Super Boo/Majin Vegeta's Suicide Explosions - These are forbidden simply because, in Super Boo's case, it is incredibly cheap. And in Majin Vegeta's case, it kills him AND is incredibly cheap (in a versus topic, in the series it was cool as hell).

Garlic Jr's Immortality - Technically, Garlic Jr. could beat SSj4 Gogeta (full power) simply because Garlic Jr. cannot die. He would win by default because Gogeta's fusion time would run out. When using Garlic Jr. in a fight, you must assume he is NOT immortal. While it's a huge thing of Garlic Jr's appearance in the series, it is so uber hax that it has to be excluded from him when used in a fight. That doesn't mean Garlic Jr. cannot be used in a versus battle. Just treat him as if he wasn't immortal though.

Bio-Broly's Water Vulnerability - This is actually hilarious because it's a reverse hax. As you know if you've seen movie 11, Bio-Broly is
Spoiler: click to toggle
. In fights dealing with Bio-Broly, simply ignore the fact that Bio-Broly has such a ridiculous weakness. ANY character in the series, from the beginning of Dragonball to the end of GT could kill Bio-Broly by exploiting his humorous hydrophobia.

Baby's Possession - Any fight involving Bebi/Baby cannot be ended with simply "Baby can possess his opponent" or something silly like that. This one's fairly obvious.

Cell's Explosion - Although this could fall under the "blow up the planet" category, I thought it deserved special mention. Don't use Cell's ability of self-destruction in a versus battle (for reference, if you don't know what I'm talking about, this is the form Cell took after puking up #18 in the fight against Super Saiyan 2 Gohan at the Cell Games, and, out of desperation, tried to blow up the planet.)

Boo's Regeneration - Okay, this one definitely needs some clarification. This is borderline hax. Boo can regenerate infinitely and from tiny particles with no chi loss whatsoever. This is borderline hax, but, a fundamental part of Boo's nature. However, use care in using it in a debate and realize that it cannot be the answer to every Boo versus battle. Yes, it's a huge advantage, but, it's also probable that SSj3 Goku could kill Chibi Boo, given enough energy in one blast. Boo's regeneration is completely legit and not banned, I'm just saying use caution.

I'm not banning any unique abilities or techniques. For instance, Cell's regeneration, Piccolo's regeneration, Boo's regeneration (to an extent), LSSj Broly's constantly recovering chi/stamina, the Androids' unlimited power supplies, Androids #19 #20 and Super 17's energy absorption, Hirudegarn and Janemba's time/dimensional warping, etc. These are all legit. I'm only banning the uber hax ones that could cause the specific user of that technique to win most, if not all, versus battles that they are put in simply because they have that technique.
Edited by Sam, Aug 3 2016, 03:47 PM.
WoW Legion Ending - Thank you Darker for making this into one, big incredible gif! <3
Member Offline View Profile Goto Top
 
Sam
Member Avatar
It takes a mere second for treasure to turn to trash.

Major New Versus Rule: Do not post any extremely ridiculous matchups. For instance, no Super Saiyan 4 Mr. Satan vs. Kaioken Farmer w/ Shotgun. Or Oozaru Freeza vs. Ultimate Kuririn.

To clarify a little further, you can make a versus topic on something that could be possible. For instance, Super Saiyan 3 Vegeta, while it never actually happened, is still something that could have happened because Vegeta is a Saiyan and thus technically could go SSj3, he just didn't figure out how canonically. However, you cannot make a topic giving Super Saiyan or Kaioken powers and the like to characters that it is impossible for them to attain the form. For instance, no Oozaru Cell's and such. Basically, limit the ridiculous versus topics. It is up to the moderator's discretion to figure out if a versus topic is or is not in violation of this rule. However, if you are giving Super Saiyan or Kaioken powers to someone that isn't a Saiyan, for instance, this sort of thing is from here on out, banned. We feel as if this kind of debating simply reduces the versus section to a big numbers debate, as all it does is makes each and every battle a [Base Character + Power-Up Modifier = X] and everyone has different numbers to plug into that equation, and eventually it's a big numbers game.

There could never be a Super Namek Mr. Satan, or a Super Saiyan 4 Puar or a Oozaru Chibi Boo or SSj5 Bulma, so, don't make it a versus topic. It is silly and a little ridiculous. Topics like this will be locked from here on out. Repeat offenders will be warned and possibly suspended from the versus section.

Thanks,
Necifix
Edited by Sam, Jan 16 2013, 04:11 AM.
WoW Legion Ending - Thank you Darker for making this into one, big incredible gif! <3
Member Offline View Profile Goto Top
 
Sam
Member Avatar
It takes a mere second for treasure to turn to trash.

Notice: Please do NOT include "SSjG" or SSj "God" in any versus battles until the new movie is released and/or we learn significant details about the new form. Since we know little about it, don't make a versus topic about it. Because moderators have been frequently and publicly closing topics like this for weeks now, anyone found using this form in a versus battle will be warned and their topic closed.

Also, do not include the character Bills in any versus battles for the same reasons and penalties as above.

Thanks and I apologize for the inconvenience. This rule is obviously no longer in effect when the movie releases.

Necifix
Head Global Moderator
Consort of Swiss Cheese
Edited by Sam, Mar 5 2013, 05:32 AM.
WoW Legion Ending - Thank you Darker for making this into one, big incredible gif! <3
Member Offline View Profile Goto Top
 
Copy_Ninja
Member Avatar
Novacane for the pain

Clarification: The rule about DBZ characters vs other anime/manga has been removed, such vs are NOT allowed, so please refrain from making them and note that such threads will be removed or locked in the future. Thank You.
Posted ImageWe'll never be those kids again
Member Offline View Profile Goto Top
 
+ Emmeth
Member Avatar
I Yoeri

Samuel
Mar 4 2013, 03:17 AM
Notice: Please do NOT include "SSjG" or SSj "God" in any versus battles until the new movie is released and/or we learn significant details about the new form. Since we know little about it, don't make a versus topic about it. Because moderators have been frequently and publicly closing topics like this for weeks now, anyone found using this form in a versus battle will be warned and their topic closed.

Also, do not include the character Bills in any versus battles for the same reasons and penalties as above.

Thanks and I apologize for the inconvenience. This rule is obviously no longer in effect when the movie releases.

Necifix
Head Global Moderator
Consort of Swiss Cheese
I'm reinforcing this rule to apply for Dragon Ball Z: Resurrection of F. Until the movie is officially released in Japan, do not make any topics based on new forms and characters in this movie.

As per the quoted post, members will be promptly warned if they fail to follow these guidelines.

Thank you for reading this.
Edited by Emmeth, Apr 1 2015, 10:40 PM.
Posted Image
My Twitch Page
Member Offline View Profile Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
« Previous Topic · Dragon Ball Versus · Next Topic »
Locked Topic

Theme Designed by McKee91