Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Should we be worried about this?
Topic Started: Mar 24 2017, 11:33 PM (441 Views)
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/us-senate-internet-privacy-bill-vote-sell-consumer-data-browsing-history-a7646981.html


Sounds pretty alarming.

The UK passed a similar bill last year I believe, what next? Are we really moving towards a Big Brother society?
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rockman
Member Avatar
hoighty-toighty

You're missing the bigger picture. You're assuming those big companies that provide you with a service don't already know what sites you go to. If you think it's creating a Big Brother society, guess again pal, it already is. This is just letting them sell that information to make money. It could very well be anonymous data that they sell, or it could come and go directly from the user.
Either way, you'll still use the internet, you'll still adhere to their privacy policy, you still won't read the damn thing, and you'll still give up all of your privacy without noticing anyway. What are you worried about? You think that by talking about breaches in privacy that it'll magically make your presence private? Wrong friend.

I wrote an article about privacy. You might not have read it. http://dbzf.co.uk/topic/10004115/1/#new

If you just read the article, click this: https://www.google.com/#safe=off&q=%22Tim+likes+S%27mores+Poptarts+and+Peanut+Butter+M%26M%27s+%22&*

You're welcome.
Posted Image

JAke is a copyright of Spazo and Pickle Flavored Fudge Pops inc.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Well I'm pretty sure everyone knows that much but the issue here is that each thing like this is a step towards a society in which what we do on the internet can be used against us in legal action, type anything labelled bad in your browser and the police come to your door.

This allows corporations to make more money off our data and is a gateway towards more bills like it being made, if not just because money.


Nothing is truly private on the internet of course but typically it can't be used against you, you're safe in that regard unless you're up to something really terrible like terrorism but how long before the slider on what's terrible enough to warrant legal action is lowered to infringe on personal freedom?
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rockman
Member Avatar
hoighty-toighty

Steve
Mar 25 2017, 12:27 AM
Nothing is truly private on the internet of course but typically it can't be used against you, you're safe in that regard unless you're up to something really terrible like terrorism but how long before the slider on what's terrible enough to warrant legal action is lowered to infringe on personal freedom?
That's a direct contradiction.
Posted Image

JAke is a copyright of Spazo and Pickle Flavored Fudge Pops inc.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Rockman
Mar 25 2017, 12:46 AM
Steve
Mar 25 2017, 12:27 AM
Nothing is truly private on the internet of course but typically it can't be used against you, you're safe in that regard unless you're up to something really terrible like terrorism but how long before the slider on what's terrible enough to warrant legal action is lowered to infringe on personal freedom?
That's a direct contradiction.
...how?

People can see what you've been looking at on the internet but they're not allowed to do anything about it unless it's pretty serious. You can watch all the porn in the world and be fine so long as it's not extreme.


So what happens when the bar for what is considered serious enough is lowered, if you want to watch porn it better be a straight married couple only doing missionary. Sodomy is sin.

Or we could have people getting fined for talking s*** on the internet, like saying they hope Trump gets assassinated.


Now that sure seemed like a slippery slope years ago but as more bills like this get passed all over then that slope is getting pretty lubed up and politicians are only going to care when they can't dodge the invasions, which is usually a convenient stipulation.
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Emmeth
Member Avatar
I Yoeri

I'm not worried. I haven't done anything ilegal.

A big brother internet society is already a thing. Microsoft are watching you steps, Google are watching your steps. A bill like this isn't gonna change anything aside from making it official.
Posted Image
My Twitch Page
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Mitas
Member Avatar
It truly was a Shawshank redemption

I'm under the impression that everything I do on the internet is being watched anyway. Just gotta live with the consequences.
Posted Image
"Then you've got the chance to do better next time."
"Next time?"
"Course. Doing better next time. That's what life is."
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Yeah they watch but typically they don't do anything, until they decide to also give themselves the power to do that and control our lives further.

If privacy is changing then consequences are likely to as well. If people can buy others internet history what stops them smearing anyone who pisses them off?

You should be free to look at whatever you want on the internet so long as it doesn't hurt anyone, now what you look at is more readily available to be used to hurt you.

Alright for people who don't look at anything weird but what about people that do? Screw them?
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Designed by McKee91