Nagito Komaeda

Jan 30 2017, 12:47 AM

Honestly? Yes.

He hasn't shown us his tax returns, and his refusal to divest his business interests means that, as a whole, we don't know whether any move he makes will end up intentionally benefiting his businesses and interests. That, as well as his incredibly apparent lack of knowledge and tact when it comes to the position means that he's going to be doing whatever he likes. He's already gagging different departments and agencies, as well as firing good, knowledgeable people who would be able to provide him with the facts necessary to properly look at any issue.

As well as this, have you seen who he's given a National Security Council Seat to? Steve Bannon. This just emphasises that he's nominating and giving positions to people who are completely unqualified for them. Betty DeVos as Education Secretary? The woman who's been incredibly transparent with her refusal to commit to not privatising public schools. His choices are going to destroy the departments they've been chosen to lead, and this is just a condemnation of his ability to think and make decisions effectively.

Green

Jan 30 2017, 01:29 AM

Nagito Komaeda

Jan 30 2017, 12:47 AM

Honestly? Yes.

He hasn't shown us his tax returns, and his refusal to divest his business interests means that, as a whole, we don't know whether any move he makes will end up intentionally benefiting his businesses and interests. That, as well as his incredibly apparent lack of knowledge and tact when it comes to the position means that he's going to be doing whatever he likes. He's already gagging different departments and agencies, as well as firing good, knowledgeable people who would be able to provide him with the facts necessary to properly look at any issue.

As well as this, have you seen who he's given a National Security Council Seat to? Steve Bannon. This just emphasises that he's nominating and giving positions to people who are completely unqualified for them. Betty DeVos as Education Secretary? The woman who's been incredibly transparent with her refusal to commit to not privatising public schools. His choices are going to destroy the departments they've been chosen to lead, and this is just a condemnation of his ability to think and make decisions effectively.

I agree with all these issues but coming from a legal back ground, it is impossible to take any action against him until he has actually done some harm. I see the issues coming but until they actually happen, an action as significant as impeachment just cannot happen.

Nagito Komaeda

Jan 30 2017, 01:36 AM

Green

Jan 30 2017, 01:29 AM

Nagito Komaeda

Jan 30 2017, 12:47 AM

Honestly? Yes.

He hasn't shown us his tax returns, and his refusal to divest his business interests means that, as a whole, we don't know whether any move he makes will end up intentionally benefiting his businesses and interests. That, as well as his incredibly apparent lack of knowledge and tact when it comes to the position means that he's going to be doing whatever he likes. He's already gagging different departments and agencies, as well as firing good, knowledgeable people who would be able to provide him with the facts necessary to properly look at any issue.

As well as this, have you seen who he's given a National Security Council Seat to? Steve Bannon. This just emphasises that he's nominating and giving positions to people who are completely unqualified for them. Betty DeVos as Education Secretary? The woman who's been incredibly transparent with her refusal to commit to not privatising public schools. His choices are going to destroy the departments they've been chosen to lead, and this is just a condemnation of his ability to think and make decisions effectively.

I agree with all these issues but coming from a legal back ground, it is impossible to take any action against him until he has actually done some harm. I see the issues coming but until they actually happen, an action as significant as impeachment just cannot happen.

I'd argue that there's reason enough to investigate the issues, at least, especially the Muslim ban. Is there any feasible reason that he didn't include Saudi Arabia, Istanbul, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia (just a few) in the executive order? He's got business interests in those places, but they'd still fall under the justification for why he's banning travel from other countries, so what makes 'em different other than his vested interest in them?

Green

Jan 30 2017, 12:38 AM

I just saw this on Facebook. If the numbers are real, it already has over 400,000 people who have "signed". I'm not a fan of Trump but I personally believe it is far to early to attempt to Impeach him. He's done some questionable things but nothing I see to the extreme that would require that he be impeached. With little research I see that only 2 presidents ever (out of now 45) have ever even faced impeachment which shows just how hard it is to get to such a point.

Do any of you think based off of what we know now that he should be impeached? What do you think the chances are that he does get impeached soon or ever.

Sam

Jan 30 2017, 03:12 AM

Please don't start a ridiculous birther conspiracy, Political Piper, if that's what you mean.